Just the other day, news came out that Democrat Adam Schiff was panicking. Documents were about to be released that he was trying to hide for years. Today, those documents have been handed over to the public. And boy, are they a doozy! Turns out the Democrats knew Trump was innocent for years. Heads are about to roll.
When the media “exposed” the Russia collusion narrative way back in 2017, it set off a flurry of House investigations. The House Intelligence Committee interviewed numerous people, from Trump campaign staffers to intelligence officials. It was obvious that Democrats were trying to find some evidence that proved the left’s bogus claim that Trump conspired to steal the election, with help from Russia.
It never went anywhere and in 2019, Mueller revealed he found no evidence that Trump was guilty. Still, Democrats in the House kept banging the Russia drum. They frequently pointed to this story during the bogus impeachment trial. Adam Schiff specifically stated Trump was going to “steal” the 2020 Election in a similar fashion.
Yet through it all, Schiff refused to release the transcripts of interviews conducted over 2017 and 2018. The very interviews he claimed provided “direct evidence” that Trump was guilty.
But now, after intense pressure from the public, those documents have been released. Guess what? Not a single person interviewed provided a shred of evidence that Trump was guilty. Even Obama cronies couldn’t prove it. Which means—drum roll please—Schiff and his allies have been lying for three years!
Newly released transcripts from House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff’s (D-CA) closed door Russia investigation hearings show that former Obama officials and Schiff appeared to know that there was little to no evidence that the Trump campaign colluded with Russian officials during the 2016 election…
James Clapper: “I never saw any direct empirical evidence…”
Former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Samantha Power: “I am not in possession of anything…”
Susan Rice: “I don’t recall any intelligence or evidence to that effect.”…
Loretta Lynch: “I can’t say that it existed or not.”…
Former Deputy National Security Adviser Ben Rhodes: “I saw indications of potential coordination, but I did not see, you know, the specific evidence of the actions of the Trump campaign.” [Source: Daily Wire]
You might recognize some of those names. These are the same Obama-appointed officials that frequently accused Trump of collusion before the media. Yet when testifying, under oath, they had to admit they had zero evidence that suggested Trump was guilty.
So, that means Adam Schiff—who was a part of all these interviews—knew that nobody had anything on Trump. In fact, all 53 transcripts cleared Trump’s name. Yet despite that, Schiff kept saying Trump colluded with Russia. He even went on record to say he had “direct evidence” of it.
That, of course, was a lie as pathetic as Schiff himself.
James Clapper, two years after saying there was no evidence, told CNN Trump “was essentially aiding and abetting the Russians.” Another lie. For over three years, the Democrats have pushed a story that was not only false, but they knew was false.
Republicans in Congress knew it was false and demanded the release of the transcripts. They were prevented, because Shifty Schiff was made head of the Intelligence Committee. The left was allowed to spread complete falsehoods for years, because of their desperate desire to take down Trump.
The real question we have to ask now is, what are we going to do about it? Can a man like Schiff just lie, day after day, and not face penalties? Congress should censure that man. That would be a good start. The DOJ should get involved, to see if Schiff lied under oath or during crucial hearings.
Democrats must be held accountable for their schemes, at least once.