Conservative Revival


Barack Obama and his allies are giving air cover to a violent left-wing revolution trying to overthrow the country’s system of law and order.

A key front in the left’s war on America is to destroy the police which is why riots across the country erupted overnight.

Now Tucker Carlson dropped this truth bomb about police that Obama hid from you.

Leftist thugs seized on Minneapolis police murdering George Floyd as the jumping off point of a violent revolution to remove Donald Trump from office.

Rioters, anarchists and leftist street mobs looted cities, burned businesses and trashed communities in the name of fighting so-called “systemic racism” in American society and police conduct.

Tucker Carlson dismantled the myth of racist police hunting unarmed black men that Barack Obama and other racial pyromaniacs spread.

Carlson noted that five years ago the Washington Post began tracking police shootings that resulted in deaths.

The popular Fox News explained that police shot far more white people than black Americans even though black suspects were more likely to have a weapon on them at the time of the encounter.

“Since 2015, The Washington Post has maintained a comprehensive database of fatal police shootings in this country,” Carlson stated.. “Last year, the Post logged 1,004 killings. Of the 802 shootings in which race of the police officer and the suspect was noted, 371 of the those killed were white; 236 were black. The vast majority of those killed were not in fact, ‘unarmed.’ The vast majority were armed, and Africans American suspects were significantly more likely to have a deadly weapon than white suspects. Yet more white suspects were killed.”

Carlson then ran through the most recent data which showed police killed just nine unarmed black men, which was the lowest in any of the five years since the Washington Post began keeping records.

“Last year was the safest year for unarmed suspects since The Washington Post began tracking police shootings,” Carlson continued.. “It was the safest year for both white and black suspects.”

Carlson noted that police killed 19 unarmed white suspects.

By comparison, it was much more deadly to be a police officer in America with 48 cops being killed in the line of duty.

The numbers are the numbers.

Despite the horrific examples of cops killing innocents like George Floyd the numbers are the numbers.

“Again, those are the facts,” Carlson added. “They are not in dispute. Are African Americans being ‘hunted,’ as Joy Reid recklessly claimed on MSNBC recently? Or is something else happening? Is our nation being ripped apart by a total and complete lie, a provable lie. A lie used by cynical media manipulators and unscrupulous politicians who understand that racial strife, race hatred, is their path to power, even if it destroys the country? You have the facts now and you can decide what’s really going on.”

Police in Minneapolis murdered George Floyd.

But the police in America are not the tool of oppression to maintain a system of racism and oppression.

That is just a lie.

Conservative Revival will keep you up to date on any new developments in this ongoing story.

Author: Conservative Revival Staff

Source: Conservative Revival: Tucker Carlson Dropped This Truth Bomb About Police That Obama Hid From You

Tucker Carlson is essentially the “black sheep” of the mainstream media.

Virtually everybody in the media hates him, but the American people love him.

And he just proved why after embarrassing a fake news anchor by exposing a jaw-dropping secret.

Tucker Carlson knows exactly how to get under the left’s skin.

He isn’t afraid to talk about the facts that the rest of the media are terrified to bring up.

And in a recent segment of his show, Tucker Carlson Tonight, he did just that.

He started the segment by talking about the hypocrisy of Democrats invoking the Founding Fathers in their impeachment fight, when “the left has nothing but contempt for the men who founded this country.”

Carlson goes on to explain that they do this because they are not afraid to straight-up lie.

“So why are they suddenly saying the opposite?” Carlson asked. “Because that’s what the left does. They don’t simply lie. They invert the truth. Whatever they claim you did, is exactly what they themselves are doing.”

As an example, he went on to talk about the overblown fight over “family separation” at the border.

In reality, “family separation” is nothing out of the ordinary.

When an adult commits a crime, they are separated from their family, and when it comes to illegal immigration, that process is actually extremely helpful for young children.

Many of those children brought across the border come with sex traffickers, not their parents.

When they are separated, it becomes much more likely for immigration officials to find out if that is the case, often saving children from a life of sex trafficking.

But the left ignores that fact, and like MSNBC host Mika Brzezinski they lament it as “calculated, cruel separation of children” and “ripping babies from mothers’ arms at the border.”

With that quote, Carlson exposed hypocrisy from Brzezinski, and her husband and fellow MSNBC host Joe Scarborough, who called family separation a “humanitarian crisis” and “very hideous.”

Carlson then went on to mockingly talk about Scarborough.

“You could just feel the passion there,” said Tucker. “If there’s one thing Joe Scarborough won’t countenance — if there’s one thing, politics aside, that Joe considers just totally immoral and wrong — it’s separating families.”

After mockingly calling him “old fashioned,” and a believer in the “sacred unit” of “two parents, husband and wife” he went on to expose the secret of Scarborough and Brzezinski.

He goes on to point out that Brzezinski is Scarborough’s third wife, stating, “As Joe’s third wife put it so aptly, family separation is simply ‘calculated and cruel.’ It’s not something decent people do. Just so you know.”

Before marrying his third wife, Scarborough had four children, two each from his previous marriages.

And Brzezinski had two children from her ex-husband who she separated from in 2016.

For somebody who has separated two families personally, Scarborough is talking a big game in his opposition to temporarily separating children at the border.

Do you think Joe Scarborough is a hypocrite?

Author: Conservative Revival Staff

Source: Conservative Revival: Tucker Carlson Embarrassed a Top Trump Critic by Exposing a Jaw-Dropping Secret

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Adam Schiff never thought it would end this way.

The Ukraine scandal was supposed to be the Democrats’ ticket to power in 2020.

But then this top Democrat pulled the rug out from under Adam Schiff on impeachment.

New Jersey Democrat Jeff Van Drew was one of two Democrats to vote against House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s resolution laying out the procedures for Adam Schiff’s impeachment hearings in the Intelligence Committee.

Since no Republicans supported the measure, that showed there was bipartisan opposition to the impeachment witch hunt.

Van Drew explained his opposition to impeachment in an interview with USA Today.

The New Jersey Democrat told the paper that the Democrats trying to impeach Trump was an elite power grab reminiscent of a monarchy.

“To some folks, that’s reminiscent of what was done to kings and queens many years ago,” Van Drew stated. “Everything our country doesn’t stand for.”

Van Drew added that Democrats calling for Trump to be impeached over the so-called “whistleblower” complaint before President Trump released the transcript of his call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky proved to the American people this was nothing more than an exercise in partisan politics.

“That makes folks understandably feel this guy doesn’t have a shot and there really is something going on and there really is a deep state. I’m not saying there is, but the fix is in.”

Van Drew was not the only Democrat to back away from impeachment or get cold feet.

Kentucky Democrat John Yarmuth told fake news CNN that although he supports impeachment and removing Donald Trump from office, it was “bad politics” for the Democrats and it would backfire on them in 2020.

“The political consequences of that might not be good for Democrats because if we remove him from office, I will guarantee you the Republican Party would not nominate Mike Pence to succeed him. They would nominate someone like Nikki Haley, who would be much more difficult for Democrats to defeat.”

He added, “I don’t think this is about politics, and I don’t think we should consider politics, I just think it could be bad politics.”

For impeachment to succeed it requires bipartisan buy-in.

Richard Nixon resigned because Arizona Senator Barry Goldwater and others informed the President that he lost all support in the Senate and enough Republicans would vote with the Democrats to convict Nixon and remove him from office.

In this case, the only bipartisanship is on the side of opposing impeachment.

Not one single Republican indicated in any way, shape or form that they would vote for articles of impeachment.

But Democrats like Van Drew and Yarmuth – and many experts predict many other Democrats in districts Donald Trump carried in 2016 – believe that impeachment along partisan lines is a political disaster that will cost the Democrats dearly in 2020.

Conservative Revival will keep you up to date on any new developments in the Democrats’ impeachment witch hunt to remove President Trump from office.

Author: Conservative Revival Staff

Source: Conservative Revival: This Top Democrat Pulled the Rug Out From Under Adam Schiff on Impeachment

After months of waiting, the day President Trump and his supporters have been waiting for is about to finally happen.

That’s bad news for Barack Obama.

And it’s because William Barr is sitting on a bombshell that has Barack Obama in a full-blown panic.

Department of Justice Inspector General Michael Horowitz is set to release his long-awaited report on the FBI’s abuse of power in spying on the Trump campaign on December 9.

Horowitz is then scheduled to testify in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee on December 11.

Rumors of Horowitz’s report have been circulating around Washington for months.

But with word that the subjects of Horowitz’s review were given the opportunity to review the portions of the report that dealt with their conduct burst into the public, Americans are now getting a picture as to what Horowitz found.

Fake news outlets like CNN and the New York Times predictably acted as stenographers for Deep State agents like James Comey, Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, Andrew McCabe and James Baker.

These Deep State criminals leaked their interpretation of Horowitz’s findings to friendly fake news outlets so they could frame the facts on their terms and set the narrative to downplay any findings that the FBI targeted the Trump campaign for spying.

One example of the media acting as janitors for the Obama Deep State and cleaning up their mess was fake news “reporter” Adam Goldman claiming the FBI sending undercover operatives – Cambridge Professor Stefan Halper and an unidentified woman – to meet with Trump campaign aide George Papadopoulos to try and gather intelligence on the Trump campaign colluding with Russia was somehow not spying.

Goldman wrote:



But not even Goldman and the fake news New York Times could completely whitewash the FBI’s criminal misconduct.

Horowitz referred one FBI lawyer for criminal prosecution because he allegedly doctored an email to try and frame the Trump campaign for colluding with Russia.

And Goldman’s sources also admitted that Horowitz found so many examples of mistakes and wrongdoing that “…Mr. Horowitz will sharply criticize F.B.I. leaders for their handling of the investigation in some ways, and he unearthed errors and omissions when F.B.I. officials applied for the wiretap, according to people familiar with a draft of the report. The draft contained a chart listing numerous mistakes in the process, one of the people said.”

Former Congressman Jason Chaffetz appeared on Fox News and stated that “they didn’t spend 18 months working on this to say, ‘Hey, everything went swimmingly at the Department of Justice.’”

Chaffetz also undercut the spin by Obama’s Deep State allies that obtaining a FISA warrant against Carter Page did not constitute spying.

“By its very definition, a FISA application is a warrant to spy on somebody,” Chaffetz explained. “This person, Carter Page, happened to be on the Trump campaign. So, the mere fact that they’re trying to discredit that says a lot about the weakness of their case and their allegations.”

The villains in this story – top level FBI and Obama administration officials – that tried to rig the 2016 election and bring down Donald Trump all based on a hoax have every incentive to flood the media zone with misinformation and lies to try and lessen the impact of Horowitz’s report.

But come December 9 the American people will be able to read it for themselves and come to their own conclusions.

Conservative Revival will keep you up to date on any new developments in this ongoing story.

Author: Conservative Revival Staff

Source: Conservative Revival: William Barr Is Sitting on a Bombshell That Has Barack Obama in a Full-Blown Panic

Adam Schiff believes he can get away with anything.

But there are some lines that even he can’t cross in his attempts to impeach Trump.

And Schiff was just caught red-handed in a sick scheme that will end him.

Since day one of President Trump’s presidency, he hasn’t been opposed to investigations.

Even when they are fruitless, he simply wants the truth to be known.

At the start of the Mueller investigation into Russia collusion, Trump was fine with it, until he realized it was nothing more than a witch hunt.

The recent impeachment probe is the same.

Trump knows he did nothing wrong, and that a fair court would find that very quickly considering they wouldn’t find any evidence of a crime to begin with.

But what he has a problem with is Adam Schiff’s secret impeachment court which is operating entirely with the rules written by rabidly anti-Trump Republicans who have been in favor of impeaching him since the first day he got into office, and would impeach him over literally anything they could if given the opportunity.

And despite purported attempts to quell these concerns, Schiff continues to make things even worse.

Schiff recently announced that Republicans can bring witnesses before this impeachment court, and potentially for public hearings.

But just as quickly as he gave them this news, he smacked Republicans with news proving that his “olive branch” offering is far from fair.

He told Rep. Devin Nunes, who is the ranking Republican in the House Intelligence Committee, that any witnesses he brings forward must be able to answer three questions that are framed to favor Democrat talking points.

The questions Schiff detailed in his letter to Nunes are below:

“1. Did the President request that a foreign leader and government initiate investigations to benefit the President’s personal political interests in the United States, including an investigation related to the President’s political rival and potential opponent in the 2020 U.S. presidential election?

Did the President — directly or through agents — seek to use the power of the Office of the President and other instruments of the federal government in other ways to apply pressure on the head of state and government of Ukraine to advance the President’s personal political interests, including by leveraging an Oval Office meeting desired by the President of Ukraine or by withholding U.S. military assistance to Ukraine?

Did the President and his Administration seek to obstruct, suppress, or cover up information to conceal from the Congress and the American people evidence about the President’s actions and conduct?”

If it were a Republican sending these demands to a Democrat in any committee they control, all hell would break loose in the media.

Schiff and his Democrat pals are welcome to haul anybody they want before the committee.

But before any Republican is given the same opportunity, they must go through a labyrinth of requirements that are entirely decided by Schiff and his friends who control the House of Representatives.

The only fair thing to do now would be to immediately force Schiff to shut down his impeachment court, which has crossed the line on dozens of occasions, and continues to divide the nation.

Do you think Adam Schiff’s impeachment court should be shut down?

Author: Conservative Revival Staff

Source: Conservative Revival: Adam Schiff Was Caught Red-Handed in a Sick Scheme That Will End Him

Adam Schiff thought he had the perfect plan to take down Donald Trump.

Schiff would run a Soviet-style impeachment investigation in secret and then spring his “findings” on the public in a lighting quick strike to ram articles of impeachment through Congress.

But Adam Schiff sat in stunned silence as impeachment crumbled before his very eyes.

Thanks to selective leaks from his opening statement, Adam Schiff portrayed Ukrainian Ambassador Bill Taylor’s testimony as “devastating” to the President.

Fake and corrupt news media so-called “journalists” picked up Schiff’s cues and pushed the narrative that Taylor’s testimony could prove to be the breaking point and force Republican Senators to throw President Trump overboard in a Senate trial.

But a close examination of Taylor’s testimony – as well as the accounts of Republicans that attended Taylor’s depositions – revealed that Taylor traded in little more than third or fourth hand gossip on Donald Trump arranging a quid pro quo on Ukrainian military aid.

In addition, it became clear that Taylor was another power mad bureaucrat that tried to usurp the authority of the President of the United States’ ability to make foreign policy.

In his testimony, Taylor mentioned National Security Council staffer Tim Morrison 15 times.

Taylor claimed Morrison could corroborate Taylor’s hearsay testimony that the Trump administration arranged a corrupt quid pro quo on military aid to Ukraine.

Adam Schiff swiftly called Morrison to testify.

And it turned out to be an epic mistake and Morrison shredded Taylor’s testimony and blew up the impeachment narrative Schiff spent weeks carefully crafting.

Taylor claimed that Morrison recounted a conversation with European Union Ambassador Gordon Sondland where Sondland told Morrison that Ukrainian military aid was dependent on their President announcing an investigation into Joe Biden.

In addition, Taylor claimed Morrison conducted a secret meeting with the Ukrainian National Security Advisor in a hotel room.

Morrison told Schiff that Taylor lied on both counts.

“My recollection is that Ambassador Sondland’s proposal to Mr. Yermak was that it could be sufficient if the new Ukrainian prosecutor general—not President Zelensky—would commit to pursue the Burisma investigation.” Morrison continued, “I also would like to clarify that I did not meet with the Ukrainian National Security Advisor in his hotel room, as Ambassador Taylor indicated on page 11 of his statement. Instead, an NSC aide and I met with Mr. Danyliuk in the hotel’s business center.”

Morrison also blew up two other of Schiff’s pro-impeachment talking points.

Reports indicated that Morrison listened to the July 25 phone call between Donald Trump and the Ukrainian President and took his concerns about what President Trump said on the call to the National Security Council’s legal advisor.

That was false.

Morrison did go to the National Security Council’s legal advisor, but only because he feared seditious leaks from rogue Deep State agents like Lt. Colonel Robert Vindman – who also listened to the call and held the delusional belief that bureaucrats such as himself – and not the President – set U.S. foreign policy.

“I promptly asked the NSC Legal Advisor and his Deputy to review it. I had three concerns about a potential leak of the MemCon: first, how it would play out in Washington’s polarized environment; second, how a leak would affect the bipartisan support our Ukrainian partners currently experience in Congress; and third, how it would affect the Ukrainian perceptions of the U.S.-Ukraine relationship.”

And Morrison drove the final stake through the heart of impeachment by testifying that he heard nothing illegal or improper on the call.

“I want to be clear, I was not concerned that anything illegal was discussed,” Morrison testified.

Conservative Revival will keep you up to date on any new developments in this ongoing story.

Author: Conservative Revival Staff

Source: Conservative Revival: Adam Schiff Sat in Stunned Silence as Impeachment Crumbled Before His Eyes

The CIA has been working double-time to cover up Obama’s crimes.

But this was so big that they couldn’t keep it hidden forever.

William Barr discovered a huge secret that could send Barack Obama to jail.

The Democrats have gone wild because Trump asked Ukraine to investigate Joe Biden.

They seem to have forgotten that Barack Obama committed crimes that would have made Richard Nixon grow cold.

Richard Nixon had to work to cover up his crimes as former FBI deputy director William Mark Felt was leaking information about Nixon’s wrongdoing to the press.

But Obama knew that he had a FBI and CIA that were committed to working for him and not the American people.

He had the FBI spying on Trump’s campaign.

This is a historic overstep by the federal government.

There is no way that Obama should authorize the FBI working to get dirt on his political opponent without just cause.

And what caused the Russia collusion myth to start?

It started because of a dossier from unknown sources, collected by an ex-British spy that was published on Buzzfeed.

It’s always a bad sign when the FBI is getting their information from Buzzfeed. Buzzfeed is best known for its cute pop quizzes rather than anything approaching serious journalism.

This should never have happened.

But now that Trump is President, the DOJ is looking into the matter.

William Barr is doing his finest work and because of new information he has expanded his probe.

The DOJ has declined to answer if this has morphed into a criminal investigation.

NBC News reported:

The prosecutor conducting the review, Connecticut U.S. Attorney John Durham, has expressed his intent to interview a number of current and former intelligence officials involved in examining Russia’s effort to interfere in the 2016 presidential election, including former CIA Director John Brennan and former director of national intelligence James Clapper, Brennan told NBC News.

Durham has also requested to talk to CIA analysts involved in the intelligence assessment of Russia’s activities, prompting some of them to hire lawyers, according to three former CIA officials familiar with the matter. And there is tension between the CIA and the Justice Department over what classified documents Durham can examine, two people familiar with the matter said.

With Barr’s approval, Durham has expanded his staff and the timeframe under scrutiny, according to a law enforcement official directly familiar with the matter. And he is now looking into conduct past Donald Trump’s inauguration in January 2017, a Trump administration official said.

An unnamed DOJ spokesperson said that William Barr was looking into Ukraine’s involvement with the beginning of the Russia hoax.

The scandal in the Russia investigation is that it ever started in the first place.

And it’s terrifying that most Americans aren’t aware that Obama abused power in such a horrific manner.

Do you think that when William Barr gets to the bottom of this investigation it will be very bad news for Barack Obama?

Author: Conservative Revival Staff

Source: Conservative Revival: William Barr Discovered a Huge Secret That Could Send Barack Obama to Jail

Nancy Pelosi is trying to break the law in an outrageous way.

She is doing her best to destroy American democracy.

Nancy Pelosi made a shocking confession that will make your blood boil.

Incumbent presidents have a very good chance of being reelected.

Especially if the country is doing well.

And America has never been doing better.

Unemployment is at a record low and the economy is booming.

And Democrats need to make the case in 2020 that America needs them to fix their problems.

But you don’t have to fix something that isn’t broken.

That’s why Nancy Pelosi is trying to get around that Democratic system and take out Trump with her kangaroo court instead of listening to the voice of the people.

She doesn’t care about voters, and she doesn’t care about carrying out impeachment in the proper legal way.

She just wants to make up a charge against Trump that Democrats can get behind.

But she’s so afraid of a vote that she won’t even bring impeachment to a vote in her Democrat-run Congress.

This impeachment is an effort by Democrats to stifle the choice of the American people and gain power by whatever means necessary.

Nancy Pelosi even admitted on camera that she doesn’t care about the voters.

According to Breitbart News:

On Thursday at her weekly press briefing, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) said the American people were “not going to decide” if President Donald Trump should be impeached.

When asked about the impeachment timeline, Pelosi said, “I keep saying to people, impeachment is about the truth and the Constitution of the United States. Any other issues that you have, disapproving of the way the president has dealt with Syria, whatever the subject is, reluctance, the cowardice to do something about gun violence, the cruelty of not wanting to help our Dreamers and transgender people, the denial about the climate crisis that we face, the list goes on, that’s about the election. That has nothing to do with what is happening in terms of our oath of office to protect and defend the Constitution and the facts that might support. And we don’t know where this path will take us, it could take us down further path but the two are completely separate.”

A reporter asked, “At what point might you say let’s just let the voters decide.”

Pelosi said, “The voters are not going to decide whether we honor our oath of office. They already decided that in the last election.”

If Pelosi was truly trying to honor her office she would act in a fair and rational way.

But she had no problem with Obama using the FBI to spy on Trump’s campaign without reason during the entire 2016 election, but thinks that it’s criminal that Trump asked that Biden’s shady dealings be investigated.

Impeachment is just a political maneuver to take power away from voters.

Do you as a voter feel like Nancy Pelosi needs to act in a more democratic manner and stop running the impeachment just on her authority?

Author: Conservative Revival Staff

Source: Conservative Revival: Nancy Pelosi Made a Shocking Confession That Will Make Your Blood Boil

The news media has come up with an awful plot to help Democrats.

They are hoping that they can bamboozle people into believing that Trump is guilty.

CBS tried to fool Americans by rigging this impeachment poll in their favor.

The Democrats have a powerful tool in the mainstream media.

Obama’s administration had far more scandals than Trump’s and yet a large portion of the population doesn’t remember it.

Obama used both the IRS and the FBI to target his political opponents.

Those are far more serious offences than anything that Democrats have accused Trump of doing.

And they don’t even have any solid evidence to back up their allegations.

Their accusations against Trump are vague because they have no actual evidence that Trump has committed anything that is worthy of being considered an impeachable offence.

The Democrats just hate him.

And the media is trying to convince every American they need to hate Trump too.

They have stopped being journalists who report the truth and are now just propagandists who will twist facts and lie to help the Democrats.

CNN, CBS and MSNBC have gone wild trying to make the call with the Ukrainian president look worse than it is.

The latest example of their bias is a poll that CBS released that claimed that most Americans favor impeachment.

However there are problems with the way they gathered their data.

Attkisson from The Hill looked into it more closely and this is what she discovered:

“A check of the poll data shows it interviewed 124 more Democrats than Republicans. That’s a statistically significant difference — 6 percentage points more Democrats than Republicans,” Attkisson wrote. “Assuming, for the sake of argument, that Democrats and Republicans generally respond along party lines, a sample that looked at 6 percentage points more Republicans instead of Democrats would blow the ‘headline’ that ‘a majority of Americans’ favors the impeachment inquiry. It would, theoretically, change the pro-impeachment inquiry majority to a minority: 49 percent favoring the impeachment inquiry, and 51 percent opposing.”

The poll was even more skewed by the way that CBS reported the results.

As Attkisson continued:

“The CBS poll shows 58 percent say Trump does not deserve to be impeached or that it’s ‘too soon to say.’ Using the same math as above, adjust that for the lopsided number of Democrats interviewed and it would theoretically become 64 percent believing that Trump doesn’t deserve impeachment or it’s too soon to know.

“Then, 69 percent of Republicans who were asked about an impeachment inquiry say it makes them want to defend Trump. In other words, there is reason to believe the inquiry could be a motivational factor for Republicans in an election year — in a way that benefits Trump.”

She summed it up by saying that the real headline should have been: “Majority of Americans in Democrat-heavy poll favor an impeachment inquiry into President Trump.”

It seems that Democrats haven’t learned from the 2016 election that skewing polls doesn’t actually change the future.

Do you think that manipulating poll numbers is actually helping Democrats?

Author: Conservative Revival Staff

Source: Conservative Revival: CBS Tried to Fool Americans by Rigging This Impeachment Poll in Their Favor

Whispers are already flying around Washington about the next Supreme Court vacancy.

But even Donald Trump was unprepared for what was about to come next.

And President Trump was hit with this jaw-dropping news about two Supreme Court Justices retiring.

The next Presidential Election is a little over 400 days away.

Democrats are not willing to wait that long to see if they can drive Donald Trump from office.

That’s because the fate of two Supreme Court Justices hangs in the balance.

Nancy Pelosi and her lackeys in Congress launched an impeachment inquiry based on a totally fake and manufactured “scandal” surrounding President Trump’s July 25 call to the Ukrainian President.

Democrats are desperate to impeach the President because they believe it will damage the Republican Party’s prospects in the 2020 election.

Either the Senate will convict Donald Trump on the House Democrats’ articles of impeachment and remove the President from office, or Democrats hope that even in defeat, enough Senate Republicans break with the President to fracture the GOP heading into Trump’s re-election campaign.

Despite the bravado the party projects based on the current public opinion polling, the left is sweating over the 2020 election.

They know head-to-head matchup polls this far from an election mean nothing.

Smart Democrats recognize that the President is running for re-election with no new foreign wars and a growing economy.

That is the recipe for an incumbent president to win re-election.

If Trump wins re-election and Republicans hold the Senate, the Democrats face Supreme Court Armageddon.

Liberal Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer are 86 and 81 years old respectively.

And they both could step down if Donald Trump wins re-election in 2020.

Ginsburg’s battled four bouts with cancer including treatments to remove tumors on her lungs and pancreas in the last year.

Breyer suffers from no similar health ailments, but some court watchers wonder if Breyer tires of ending up in the minority on the majority of important cases.

Everyone expects Ginsburg and Breyer to hang on through 2020 in the hopes a Democrat will win so they can retire and be replaced by a younger leftist.

But if Trump should win and one or both retire, then Washington will go nuclear.

Mike Davis – who heads the Article III Project to support President Trump’s judicial nominees – told Reuters that a confirmation hearing to replace Ginsburg or Breyer would make the Kavanaugh circus look like a church picnic.

Reuters reports:

Former senior Republican Senate aide Mike Davis, who runs a group called the Article III Project that he set up to support Trump’s judicial nominations, said he would expect Republicans to be energized by any potential election-year vacancy. But Davis said he also would expect Democrats to put up a fight.

“If people thought that Justice Kavanaugh’s confirmation fight was ugly, just wait until the next one,” Davis said, referring to contentious Senate hearings in which Kavanaugh denied allegations of decades-old sexual misconduct.

Conservative Revival will keep you up to date on any new developments in this ongoing story.

Author: Conservative Revival Staff

Source: Conservative Revival: Trump Was Hit With Jaw-Dropping News About Two Supreme Court Justices Retiring

Ad Blocker Detected!

Advertisements fund this website. Please disable your adblocking software or whitelist our website.
Thank You!