Author

Sons of 1776

Browsing

The Senate impeachment trial kicked off this week. It might drag on for another week or two. Democrats claim removing Trump from office is an “urgent” need, after what he did during a phone call with Ukraine. The left says this entire process has been about holding Trump accountable for that one act. But recently, surfaced video proves that one of the left’s biggest proponents, Chuck Schumer, was gunning for impeachment much longer.

We know there are a few radical, left-wing lunatics in the Democratic Party that have been talking about impeachment since Trump entered office. Namely, Maxine Waters and Al Green. These unhinged, deranged politicians have gone on CNN (and anywhere else they’d be heard) to demand the impeachment of Donald Trump.

They didn’t have any proof of a crime, they just wanted him gone. The rest of the party claimed to not want impeachment, until the whistleblower came out with “proof” of Trump’s wrongdoing. Pelosi claimed to be against impeachment, until she flip-flopped. They said it was urgent to remove Trump because of how he “pressured” Ukraine during the call.

Their entire case against President Trump is built around that call. They say the Constitution is in danger. That removing Trump is a matter of national security. Democrats said they take no pleasure in impeaching Trump.

Then why did one of their main players in the Senate trial talk about impeaching him a year before this process began? Chuck Schumer is leading the charge in the Senate for the removal of Donald Trump. And way before the “whistleblower” came out with his botched complaint, he was pushing for impeachment.

Well before President Donald Trump made the phone call to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky that is at the center of the impeachment trial, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer was eager to remove the president from office.

Schumer appeared to publicly endorse impeachment as early as September 2018 — nearly 10 months before the July 2019 phone call that triggered a whistleblower complaint.

“When are you all going to impeach Trump?” Schumer was asked while walking in a Labor Day parade.

“The sooner the better,” Schumer said through his megaphone.

“We gotta get a few Republicans,” the New York senator added. “We Democrats are on your side.” [Source: Daily Caller]

Uh-oh. Chucky was caught cheering for impeachment in the fall of 2018. Just a few months before the Midterm Elections, when Democrats were trying to force a “blue wave.” He said the “sooner” Trump was impeached “the better.” He followed that up with a clear explanation of the left’s plan, saying they needed to win over a few Republicans to make it happen (which is what they’re trying to do in the Senate, right now).

Schumer claimed he “misheard” the question and was talking about the next election. Uh-huh, we believe you Chucky. That’s why you said you needed a “few Republicans” to beat Trump in 2020. That makes sense.

Chuck’s behavior undermines the left’s claim that impeaching Trump was sparked by the Ukraine call. Schumer said he wanted Trump removed as soon as possible. He was even apparently strategizing an impeachment plan back in September 2018.

Kind of makes it hard to believe that the Democrats “had no choice” but to impeach, because of the Ukraine call.

Sounds more like they were working on finding an excuse to impeach him for a long time. Then they whipped up a bogus narrative about what he said during a phone call. Only to be humiliated when Trump released the transcripts.

Nobody can really trust what Schumer is saying now. He’s not pushing impeachment because it’s good for the country. He’s pushing it because all this time, he wanted Trump gone. Schumer and the rest of the Democrats can’t sit back and watch the president put Americans first. They can’t stand how much Trump is winning for the country.

So, they are desperate to remove him from office before November. But, I have a feeling he’s going to have a hard time getting those “few Republicans.”

President Trump has continued to make history, ever since he was elected. His biggest victories have come from making good on his campaign promises, despite overwhelming opposition. Perhaps his greatest accomplishments have come in the form of protecting American lives at every stage. And this Friday, he will once again make history when he appears at a 40+ year tradition.

The March for Life event has occurred every year since Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court ruling that made abortion legal. For forty-seven years, millions of Americans have traveled to Washington, D.C. to take a stand against the barbaric practice of abortion.

During that time, we’ve seen some incredible changes. Conservative leaders—in local and federal government—have fought to limit abortion’s scourge on our society. Past presidents have set rules to prevent U.S. dollars from funding abortion around the world. Republican-lead states have prevented or limited abortion in many cases.

But during the years of the Obama administration, abortion became out of control. Hundreds of millions of dollars were pumped into Planned Parenthood, an organization that prioritizes abortions (targetting mostly minority families). Obama encouraged abortions around the world, providing American funds to facilitate them. In Democrat-controlled states, abortion numbers reached new highs.

Then Donald Trump was elected president. His leadership has struck the greatest blow against the evils of abortion since perhaps Reagan. It might be the single reason Democrats hate him the most. He reinstated the Mexico City policy, he’s limited federal funds for abortions, and he’s appointed numerous pro-life judges and federal employees.

That includes two Supreme Court justices, giving the court it’s first conservative majority in years. Perhaps Roe v. Wade will be overturned sooner than we think.

Now, Trump is making history again, as he prepares to be the first president to appear at the March for Life rally this Friday.

President Donald Trump will attend the March for Life in Washington, D.C., Friday, making him the first U.S. president to do so.

The president will speak at the 47th annual March for Life, a pro-life demonstration following the anniversary of Roe v. Wade, March for Life President Jeanne Mancini announced Wednesday night.

The announcement comes one day after the president declared Jan. 22, the anniversary of Roe v. Wade, the Sanctity of Human Life Day…

Trump becoming the first president to ever attend the March for Life in person is “a testament to his commitment to protecting the sanctity of life,” Trump campaign deputy press secretary Sarah Matthews told the Daily Caller News Foundation. [Source: Daily Caller]

The Trump administration had already set records for this march in the past. In 2017 and 2019, Vice President Mike Pence attended and spoke at the event. President Trump addressed the event in 2018 via satellite.

Now, President Trump will be at the event in person, the first president ever to do so. This not only is a big deal for the movement and all those attending, but it lends huge weight to the pro-life rally.

Democrats and the liberal media largely ignore this momentous event, hoping to hide the fact that millions of Americans are pro-life. They want the country to this March for Life is attended by a small minority of backward Americans.

After all, if more and more people see the kind of effect March for Life is having, they’ll back it too.

With President Trump attending, even more attention will be paid to this event. Millions of Americans will see just how passionate we are about ending abortion in this country. Pro-life citizens around the country will be empowered to stand up for their convictions. They will realize they are not alone, even if they live in a radical, liberal state.

President Trump’s speech will be posted to websites, blogs, and social media. It will be viewed around the world. That’s the last thing Democrats want, especially during their coordinated attempt to hurt his re-election, a.k.a: the impeachment.

But they will not be able to stop it. President Trump will continue to be an advocate for the unborn. And his presidency will mark a major turning point in the war to end abortion.

In only a few weeks, the first primary votes will be cast for the 2020 Democrat nomination. Yet still, there isn’t a clear frontrunner among the “top” liberal candidates. One of the men running for president, Pete Buttigieg, held a rally in Iowa. Even speaking to his own supporters, he couldn’t get the reaction he wanted. Boy, was it painful to watch.

You’d think, right now, candidates like “Mayor Pete” would have the upper hand in Iowa. Why? Because several of his contenders have been forced to fly back to Washington to participate in the Senate impeachment trial. Warren, Sanders, and Klobuchar have been taken off the campaign trail, thanks to Nancy Pelosi’s bogus impeachment scheme.

That gives candidates like Joe Biden and Pete Buttigieg a chance to capture voters like never before. Sanders can’t hold events. Warren’s hands are tied. Three of the main candidates are out of the picture, perhaps for many weeks. So, you can imagine this is prime time for a person like Buttigieg, who needs all the attention he can get.

How is he handling this opportunity? Uh… not great. Already, he’s made a mess of things—just like he’s made a mess of his city, South Bend.

Former South Bend, Indiana Mayor Pete Buttigieg elicited a moment of awkward silence during a campaign event in Iowa that’s sparking comparisons to another viral moment during the 2016 election cycle…

“By having better hands guided by better values on those pulleys and levers of American government,” Buttigieg told the crowd. “So I’m going to look to you to spread that sense of hope to those that you know.”

The candidate took a brief pause, which was met with complete silence by attendees.

“Come on!” Buttigieg exclaimed and awkwardly chuckled, to which the crowd applauded. [Source: Fox News]

The entire exchange was brief, but still painful to watch. Buttigieg was speaking to a handful of supporters. During his speech, I guess he thought he was getting to a momentous part. But when he paused for effect, nobody responded. There weren’t even any “hms” and “ah-has.” Just dead, embarrassing silence.

Mayor Pete had to rouse the crowd by adding “come on” which woke them up out of their comas. As if on cue, they started clapping. You can’t really blame them for their silence. How the heck is a person supposed to react to something like, “having better hands guided by better values on those pulleys and levers”?

What does that even mean?

People are drawing comparisons to this awkward moment with an infamous one by Jeb Bush in 2016. Once again, a candidate struggling to connect with supporters had to egg them on and clap. He literally said, “please clap” to elicit the response he wanted.

Not great, you guys. A powerful leader doesn’t need an “applause sign” to get people to respond the way they want. Have you ever seen Donald Trump pleading with his audiences? Do people need to be told when to clap when Trump is speaking?

The ability to connect and inspire people is something a would-be president needs. Not just to get them excited and to vote. A president has a big job ahead of him. He has to lead the country, overcome numerous obstacles, and see us through hard times.

A good president not only faces opposition from abroad, but intense opposition from within. Just look at how the Democrats have tried to undermine President Trump. Without the undying support of millions of Americans, would be as successful as he is now? I wouldn’t think so.

How can Buttigieg get lawmakers to get on board with his plans, should he enter the White House? How can he inspire foreign leaders to sign agreements? How can he convince opposing parties to put aside their differences and compromise?

If he can’t even get a few people to clap after he talks?

This might not seem like a big thing, but it is. Mayor Pete wants to be the next president, but he can’t even motivate his own supporters.

That’s pretty bad in my book.

It’s clear that the Democrats’ entire strategy over their impeachment sham is to drag it out as long as possible. How long? How does the November election sound? Nancy sat on the articles as long as she could. Now, Senate Democrats want to turn a speedy trial into an unending sideshow. But Mitch McConnell is about to rain on their parade with a kill switch rule.

Let’s just get this out of the way: Democrats never expected to remove Trump from office. There is just too much working against them. Had the Russian hoax worked out, it would have been a cakewalk. But this Ukraine phone call scheme just doesn’t hold enough water. So, why did they impeach him at all?

Because they were hoping impeachment would do enough damage to Trump’s reputation, that the American people would turn on him, come November 2020. This entire thing has been about politics. Democrats want to stir up as much bad blood against the president, that their candidate would have an unfair upper hand.

When have Democrats ever played fair?

That’s the main reason Nancy Pelosi rushed her “urgent” impeachment vote in the House—then sat on it for nearly a month. Her real plan was to never send the articles to the Senate, not until the fall. She exposed her true motives when she said Trump was “impeached forever.” This entire charade has just been about staining the president’s reputation.

Pelosi was pressured by her own party to send the articles over. That means this thing will end early February. Americans will have moved passed it by November. The last-ditch effort by Democrats to affect the election is to drag this trial out by bringing in more witnesses.

We know more witnesses won’t change the outcome. If the House couldn’t do a good enough job investigating this issue, a Senate trial won’t be a do-over. But Democrats only want impeachment to last as long as possible, to further damage Trump’s reputation.

But Mitch McConnell is not having any of that. He’s preparing a rule that will put an end to this circus once and for all.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell reportedly is close to finalizing a rule that would allow President Trump’s team to move to dismiss the articles of impeachment in the Senate quickly after some evidence has been presented, as a sort of safety valve in case Democrats try to drag out the trial for weeks…

Ted Cruz told Fox News’ “Sunday Morning Futures” that the trial could extend “to six to eight weeks or even longer” if the Senate decided to hear from additional witnesses…

Trump, Hawley wrote on Twitter after Axios’ article was published, “deserves the right during Senate trial to ask for a verdict or move to dismiss – otherwise trial will become endless circus run by Adam Schiff.” [Source: Fox News]

If the Senate Democrats try to drag out the trial for weeks (through endless witnesses), McConnell will allow Trump’s team to move to dismiss.

It’s only fair. We know Democrats want Trump “impeached forever.” This has never been about upholding the Constitution, but hurting a president sure to win re-election.

Look at the left’s pathetic lineup for 2020. We are close to the first primary ballots being cast, yet none of the candidates look like winners. None of them can promise anything better than Trump. Their only plans for America are socialist programs that would ruin our current prosperity.

Meanwhile, Trump continues to show us that he’s the man for the job. He is winning again and again.

This impeachment is only about hurting his image and giving the left a leg up in the election. Democrats in the Senate will try to drag it out for as long as they can, so it might hurt Trump’s campaign. But Mitch is making sure that doesn’t happen.

We will most likely see an impeachment trial that lasts only a week or two. Trump will come out stronger.

It will backfire in the Democrats’ face, big time.

Democrats continue their campaign to remove Donald Trump from office. But what is the president doing? Scoring more wins for the American people. He just signed an order that will protect students’ First Amendment rights in public school. The order rolls back Obama-era regulations that targeted Americans of faith across the country.

When I was in high school, it was not an uncommon sight to see students engaged in religious activity. We would pray around the flag pole once a year and even hold a Bible club. Students would pray during free periods and openly discuss their faith with their friends.

This wasn’t that long ago, mind you. This was in the early 2000s. But something changed, right around the time Barack Obama entered the White House. In recent years, we’ve seen a harsh crackdown on religious freedom in America’s schools.

Students have been sued for prayer during events. New policies threatened and scared students from sharing their faith. And an atmosphere of hostility toward religious Americans festered and grew inside our own country.

But all that’s about to change. On the same day the left’s bogus impeachment moved to the Senate, President Trump took a stand for students who practice their faith in public schools.

As his impeachment trial was getting underway in the Senate, President Trump gave a hat tip Thursday to his evangelical base by updating the federal guidance on prayer in public schools — an action that came on National Religious Freedom Day.

The order is similar to a 2003 guidance on school prayer, but it establishes a mandatory filing process for complaints against local schools and school districts…

“You have things happening today that 10 or 15 years ago would have been unthinkable,” Trump said in response to a question about his views on the culture wars…

The new Trump guidance also emphasizes that students may pray or read scriptures when they have free time during school. [Source: Fox News]

President Trump’s guidance eliminates any doubt about a student’s First Amendment freedoms while in school. It makes sure that students are allowed to pray and read scripture during their free time. It also makes sure that they can freely talk about their faith to other students, the same way they are free to discuss other topics, such as politics.

Why is this so important? Because even though we are a land that protects our religious freedom, many think our faith is forbidden in public schools. Students have been attacked, rebuked, and shamed by both classmates and teachers for doing simple things like reading the Bible. Principals have forbidden prayer and even harassed students who try to express their faith. Far-left groups have sued schools that allow their students to exercise their First Amendment rights.

It’s insanity. Just because a student walks onto a public school does not mean they are no longer Americans. The very first right of the First Amendment to our Constitution protects religious freedom. No public school (or radical, left-wing group) has the power to strip a student or teacher of that right.

But the Obama-administration went to war with religious groups. Regulations put unfair and burdensome constraints on religious institutions. Some left-wing advocates tried to deny public funds to religious private schools. They sued Christian businesses, left and right.

The attitude liberals have about religious freedom is that it’s the exception, not the rule. They think that those of us who believe in God are cute and all, but we should not be allowed to express our views in public. Certainly not in public school. They’ve gone as far as oppressing religious people, so that we have zero impact on our country.

But they are in the minority. The vast majority of Americans hold to a sacred faith. And they will not allow left-wing zealots to strip us of our God-given rights.

President Trump is one of us. And he is fighting to protect our freedoms, even as the left tries to destroy him.

Something tells me their schemes to obstruct his presidency will be as successful as Egypts’ trek through the Red Sea.

After delaying for nearly a month, Nancy Pelosi and House Democrats sent their sham impeachment articles over to the Senate. Pelosi has claimed this impeachment was a “grave” and “urgent” need. Yet she refused to send them over for so long. And when she did, she was seen smiling and using special, golden pens. Celebrating so soon, Nance? Well, Sen. Ted Cruz brought her back to earth with some harsh truth.

The impeachment of Donald Trump has been a sham from day one. Democrats were hoping to take him down with the bogus Russian hoax. But even Robert Mueller refused to condemn the man with no evidence. So, the left resorted to Plan B: the phony whistleblower complaint.

From the very start of their impeachment inquiry, we knew the jig was up. They were making wild claims about the president’s actions. But they just didn’t add up to the facts. Pelosi said impeaching the president was a serious thing. That she took no pleasure in pushing a bogus impeachment and forcing her party to vote for it.

Yet through this whole ordeal, she’s been playing games. She sat on the articles for nearly a month, claiming to the fake news that Trump would be “impeached forever.” Which doesn’t even make sense (getting too old, Nancy?). When she did finally send the articles to the Senate, she was seen wearing a garish pink dress and smiling like an idiot. She even provided golden pens (paid for by you, the taxpayer) to commemorate this insult to our country.

But I don’t think Pelosi is smiling, anymore. Because Texas Senator Ted Cruz dropped a truth bomb on her and the rest of the House Democrats.

After House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who hypocritically insisted along with other House Democrats that the job of impeaching President Trump was a sad and somber duty, celebrated sending off the articles of impeachment on Wednesday by smiling and offering taxpayer-funded golden pens to those who attended, Senator Ted Cruz (r-TX) had a golden response of his own…

The good news is the partisan circus in the House is over. Nancy Pelosi’s circus is done. And we’re not going to see the one-sided show trial that the House has engaged in for months and months and months. That farce is over…

We’re going to do something that the House didn’t do: which is we’re going to give President Trump a full opportunity to defend himself, to present his case, to lay out the facts and evidence in law that the House ignored. And once the president is able to defend himself, I am confident that the result of that is that the president will be acquitted. [Source: Daily Wire]

Ted Cruz condemned Nancy Pelosi’s bogus impeachment process. He took the wind out of the left’s sails by saying that the Senate will give Trump a fair trial. The president will have the right to lay out the facts and evidence to clear his name. Fact and evidence that we all watched the House ignore.

He called the House articles “ridiculous,” because they don’t meet the Constitution’s high standard for impeachment. Democrats consulted focus groups to find the charges that most pleased their braindead base.

They want to remove Trump from office over vague non-crimes and broken feelings. They can’t stand that he’s doing what Democrats for decades refused to do: put Americans first.

But all this will blow up in the left’s faces royally. Trump will be able to make his case in the Senate trial. The whole world will be watching. What do you think he’s going to do, then? He and his team will not only clear his name, but expose every dirty deed Democrats have committed. He will have the media’s undivided attention. He’s not going to waste that opportunity.

The Democrats played dirty to try to take out your president. But he is going to make them regret wasting your time, money, and patience.

Pelosi will rue the day she ever agreed to put on this circus.

After playing games with our system of government, Nancy Pelosi is finally sending her impeachment articles to the Senate. Reports suggest that the Senate will hold their trial as early as next week. But what will this Republican-controlled event look like? Mitch Connell has made clear his intentions. But Sen. Ted Cruz suggests an entirely different approach.

You’ll be hard-pressed to find any intelligent American who says Trump committed a crime. Even as Democrats were preparing their bogus impeachment inquiry, their scheme was falling apart. That’s because the president himself released the transcript of the call between he and Ukraine.

All the wild accusations the “whistleblower” made were proven untrue. But that didn’t stop House Democrats from conducting one of the most one-sided, dishonest, and unfair mock trials in our nation’s history.

These pathetic leftists denied basic rules and government standards. They rejected any concerns or requests by House Republicans. They railroaded their sham of an impeachment, ultimately passing it on partisan lines.

Finally, after Pelosi’s pathetic stunt, the articles will go to the Senate. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell will hold a trial. This means the president will finally have a fair shake at this process. He will be allowed to defend himself and clear his name.

McConnell said he would be bringing up no new witnesses. The House had their chance to build a case against Trump and he wasn’t going to give them a “redo.” But another Republican senator has said he might allow witnesses, ones the president wants.

Texas Republican Sen. Ted Cruz said in a new interview that he is “open” to the Senate calling more witnesses in an impeachment trial, including the Trump-Ukraine whistleblower…

“It was a one-sided show trial on the House side. They denied the minority the ability to call witnesses in the House. That was contrary to the precedents that were set with both the Clinton impeachment and the Nixon impeachment.”

“In the Senate, if the president wants to call witnesses in his defense, I believe the Senate should let the president do that. If the [White House] wants to call Hunter Biden, if the [White House] wants to call the whistleblower, due process dictates that he have the opportunity to present his defense,” Cruz said. [Source: Daily Caller]

Cruz blasted House Democrats for the way they ran their joke of an impeachment inquiry. They broke established norms to brand Trump guilty until proven innocent. In the past, independent council was chosen to run an investigation. This time, partisan Democrats ran the investigation.

In the past, both parties called up witnesses to offer perspectives from various points of view. This time, Democrats called up partisan D.C. swamp dwellers as “witnesses” to give their opinion on Trump’s phone call. Republicans were denied any witnesses. People who were on the actual call were not even questioned.

You don’t have to be a political expert to see this was a total sham.

Because of that, Cruz says Trump should be allowed to call witnesses. Witnesses that should have been questioned during the House inquiry. The president is being accused of serious crimes. Democrats want to use the extreme measure of impeachment to remove the duly-elected president from office. Shouldn’t that mean he gets to defend himself?

If you get a parking ticket, you have the right to your day in court. But not the president?

Democrats think because they have a slim majority in the House, they can call the shots. Pelosi even tried to manipulate the Senate by withholding the articles. It’s clear they don’t care about upholding our democracy or respecting our president. They just want him gone, no matter what.

They’ve disgraced our system of justice again and again. They’ve wasted time and money on a bogus impeachment.

If Trump wants to torch them during a Senate trial, he has every right to. Call witnesses, expose the left’s corruption, leave them in the dust. I’m sure there are more than a few Americans who want to see him do just that.

Despite President Trump’s incredible success, Democrats continue their wrongful, unprecedented attacks. They have gone as far as impeaching the man, just so he’d stop making America great again. Reverend Franklin Graham, son of Billy Graham, gave an accurate explanation why.

He hammers Democrats to the ground.

It should come as no surprise that an opposing party would not like the president. Donald Trump is a Republican, after all, so we can’t be shocked that Democrats dislike him. But considering the massive successes he’s earned for the United States, even members of an opposing party have to acknowledge it.

The economy is setting new records every day. Trump’s added 6 million jobs. Unemployment (including black, women, and minority) is hitting historic lows. President Trump’s landed major trade deals with foreign countries—including the landmark USMCA deal, which finally gets rid of NAFTA.

And that’s not even mentioning his other victories. He’s gotten two conservative justices onto the Supreme Court. He’s defeated ISIS overseas. He’s securing our border. And he’s managed to intervene in the Middle East without starting another war.

What is there to be upset about? Why would Democrats, across the line, be so violently hateful of the man? Why do their allies in the media spend 93% of their time bashing him, his family, and his supporters? And why have Democrats in Congress wasted the last three years searching for a reason to impeach him?

Franklin Graham has the answer. He called out Democrats for their disgusting actions, exposing the depth of their corruption.

Responding to comments by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) that Trump is “impeached for life,” the prominent evangelical leader and son of Billy Graham sent out tweets offering an explanation for the unprecedented hatred for the president shown by his enemies.

“Never before has there been such a level of hatred as we have seen for Donald Trump from the Democrats & liberal media. Why? It may be because he hasn’t bowed down to them,” Graham wrote…

“This impeachment is about embarrassing President Trump & trying to win the next election,” Graham said. “But I believe American voters see through this never-ending charade.” [Source: Breitbart]

Here’s a little painful dose of reality: for many years, numerous Republicans have bowed to Democrats. We saw that with Paul Ryan, former Speaker of the House. Even though Republicans had control of Congress, this man simply rubber-stamped anything Obama handed him.

Ask yourself why Democrats didn’t bother impeaching George W. Bush—even though they accused him of “war crimes”? Why haven’t they gone after other Republican members of Congress, the way they’ve gone after Trump?

Because, until Donald Trump came on the scene, far too many conservative leaders bowed down to the tyrannical left. They refused to fight fire with fire. They refused to get their hands dirty standing up for Americans and our freedoms.

Democrats always had the upper hand, thanks to their control of the media and other major industries. They threatened to destroy any Republican that dared to fight against their agenda of pushing far-left, secular views onto our country. Republicans were actually afraid of fighting them, even though a vast majority of Americans hate liberal policies and want strong, conservative leadership.

Only after Donald Trump took the White House did we see the Republican Party change. People who once claimed to be conservative were actually acting like it. Why? Because they saw a man unwilling to bow down—as Franklin says—to the corrupt, far-left Democratic Party.

For that, the Democrats have employed a radical, torched-earth policy. They lack even a shred of professionalism toward Trump, nor even the respect due to the office of the president. Why? Because they know he’s not another dancing monkey. He means what he says and he’s going to make good on every last promise.

Democrats don’t know how to handle a Republican that actually cares about Americans. So, they’ve gone to the extremes to “impeach him for life,” or oppose him every step of the way.

That’s good enough reason to make sure every last Democrat is voted out of office, isn’t it?

We’re into 2020, but the Democratic primaries look as weak as ever. Numerous candidates have been forced to drop out, but we’ve yet to see a clear frontrunner. In recent weeks, however, one name has come to the forefront. This candidate just might snag the nomination, ensuring a swift Trump victory. But Obama and his established allies are attacking their own party to make sure that doesn’t happen.

Winning 2020 is an uphill battle for Democrats. Their allies in the House haven’t made it any easier. The bogus impeachment sham has only made the left look pathetic in the eyes of many Americans. Instead of working hard for this country, they wasted months (years really) trying to take out Donald Trump.

Meanwhile, Trump has not stopped fighting for regular Americans. Since he entered office, his accomplishments have stacked up pretty high. I don’t have to tell you about his success overseas, defeating ISIS. Or, despite overwhelming opposition, he’s getting the border wall built.

Perhaps his greatest achievements are in the economy. Since Trump entered the White House, 6 million jobs have been added to the country. The stock market has broken over 100 records. He’s landed major trade deals that will bring even more jobs back to the country. Taxes are down and wages are rising.

What can a Democrat possibly promise that’s better than that? Nothing, honestly.

What’s even worse is that most of the 2020 candidates are promising far-left socialism, at a time when Trump’s capitalist approach is working so well. Who in their right mind would elect a president that wants to destroy the economy?

But one candidate is worse than all the rest, when it comes to his extreme socialist agenda. It’s so bad, that Obama and his allies are working overtime to prevent this man from getting the nomination. His name? Bernie Sanders.

Former President Barack Obama’s 2012 campaign manager, Jim Messina, has a message for Democrats seeking to dethrone President Donald Trump in 2020: don’t nominate Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT)…

“If I were a campaign manager for Donald Trump and I look at the field, I would very much want to run against Bernie Sanders,” Messina said. “I think the contrast is the best. He can say, ‘I’m a business guy, the economy’s good and this guy’s a socialist.’”

Team Obama has been sounding the alarm on Sanders for some time, apparently afraid that Democrats will squander an opportunity to defeat the sitting president by nominating a candidate popular with only a small — but vocal — segment of the population. [Source: Daily Wire]

Obama has a reason to be scared. Sanders is neck-and-neck with “moderate” candidates like Warren and Biden. There is a good chance that he’ll be in the General Election come November.

Democrats like Obama are realizing that, while Sanders has his rabid supporters, most Americans are unwilling to embrace his toxic socialism. Reports suggest that Obama might step in and make his voice more loudly heard, if it looks like Sanders is about to clinch the nomination.

But let’s be honest. All of the major Democrat candidates are pushing socialism one way or another (with stuff like “Medicare for all”). Not one of them, Biden, Buttigieg, Warren, or the rest are really pro-capitalism. Today, the left is hostile to the free market and thriving, private businesses. Their entire platform is about expanding government power, so that we’ll have a harder time making a buck.

Sanders is the worst, by far, but none of the 2020 contenders have a chance. Trump has proved that his policies are best for the country. He’s putting Americans first in a way Democrats have always promised to do, but never did.

Obama might scheme to stop Sanders, but none of his other buddies” will make the cut. They all want to drag us back to the Dark Ages, when the White House put everyone but Americans first.

But it’s fun to see Democrats fighting each other. Keep it up, guys! You’re only helping Trump get re-elected this year!

The world breathed a sigh of relief after the U.S. killed Iranian General Qassem Soleimani. Except for Democrats. Liberals were actually upset that our president order this murderer taken out. House Democrats actually passed a resolution to rebuke Trump for what he did. The president slammed them, explaining just why he didn’t tell them ahead of time.

Democrats can blather all they want. The real reason they are opposed to Trump’s takedown of Soleimani is that they weren’t consulted first.

Think about this for a minute. This is a group of corrupt, hateful Democrats that just voted to impeach him. And they actually expected Trump would tell them his plans!

As if the president was going to grovel before Nancy Pelosi, begging her for support of this strike. Keep dreaming, Democrats.

How the Democrats have reacted to the killing of Soleimani reveals everything about who they are. Instead of appreciating Trump for killing a man who trained terrorists, they are upset. Many Democrats—both in government and the media—have defended Iran (a murderous regime). Some have even apologized to the rogue nation, even joining sides with it.

I guess they are more loyal to an evil nation that oppresses its people, rather than the Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave.

The House passed a non-binding resolution against Trump’s Iran strike. It’s essentially the congression equivalent of throwing a hissy fit. What’s really shocking is that several Republicans voted in favor of this bogus resolution (including Florida Rep. Matt Gaetz).

President Trump responded. During a rally, he revealed the real reason he kept Congress in the dark over his strike. And you’ll all agree with him.

In unequivocal terms, Trump slammed House Democrats’ nonbinding War Powers Resolution, which passed earlier in the day in a rebuke to the Soleimani strike. Trump went on to suggest that Democrats, including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and “Liddle’ pencil-neck” House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., would have tipped off the media about the operation had they known about it.

“They’re saying, ‘You should get permission from Congress, you should come in and tell us what you want to do — you should come in and tell us, so that we can call up the fake news that’s back there, and we can leak it,'” Trump said. “Lot of corruption back there.”

The president added that it would have been impractical to have alerted Congress, given the “split-second” nature of the decision to kill Soleimani. [Source: Fox News]

Trump is absolutely right. The president does not have the power to declare war without Congress (which is why everyone talking about WWIII right now are total idiots). But he does have the authority to order limited strikes in the interest of national security. Which is what he did when he killed Soleimani—a horrible terrorist who was planning an imminent attack.

Democrats wanted Trump to delay this action to get their approval. Lol, yeah okay. Trump is going to go to the most corrupt body of lawmakers in the country and ask their permission. The same crooks that have been lying about him since he entered the White House. Sure, that’s going to happen.

Trump brought up a good point. Democrats love leaking things to the media. Adam Schiff does it so often, nobody wants to talk with his House Intelligence Committee about sensitive issues, knowing he’s going to tell the press. Democrats are in bed with the media. They leak all kinds of secrets, to get special treatment from journalists.

It’s a sick, incestuous relationship, just part of the deep D.C. swamp. Why would Trump jeopardize a critical strike against an enemy, by telling these kinds of people?

The media would report on the leaks and our enemies would know our plans. That’s not how you conduct military operations, dumb Democrats. There’s this thing called the element of surprise. Congress doesn’t get that and would ruin everything.

Just like the ruin the rest of our country!

An easy one, I know, but it had to be said.

Ad Blocker Detected!

Advertisements fund this website. Please disable your adblocking software or whitelist our website.
Thank You!