Author

Sons of 1776

Browsing

All the bickering among Democrats in D.C. has taken ample attention from the left’s 2020 candidates. It has also seemed to drain enthusiasm for Democrats among protentional supporters. We’re no-where close to the election and already major candidates are running out of funds. Meanwhile, Trump’s team just announced a massive haul.

You might be wondering why Donald Trump blasted Democrat women in Congress. This is one possible reason why. All the attention the media has placed on AOC and her cronies—not to mention the ongoing feud they wage against their own party—has made many forget about the 20+ candidates running for president.

Just a few weeks ago, all the mainstream media outlets were talking about these major candidates, whom they believed could take down Trump. Now, all we hear from them is this fight between freshman congresswomen (who are polling very low) and Trump’s “go back home” remarks.

The result? Of the 20+ liberals fighting to get the Democratic nomination, only a handful will actually make it through the summer. Why? Because people have stopped caring about them and their funds have run out.

New financial disclosures show that 11 liberal contenders for the Oval Office are operating their campaigns at a deficit, having spent more money than campaign donations could support. Eight more have less than $1 million on hand. More than five months from 2020, only the front-runners have the financial means to go much further.

“This is the doomsday scenario for a lot of campaigns, where they’re grasping for air to keep their campaigns alive and to live another day,” said Washington Democrat strategist Andrew Feldman. “You can’t build an organization. You can’t build an operation that turns enthusiasm into votes without having resources to do it.” [Source: Breitbart]

It’s still pretty early in the primary cycle. Democrats have only held one round of debates. Yet already the many contenders who thought they could topple Trump have no money in the coffers.

All of these people claimed they were better for the country than Donald Trump. They all took turns bashing the man who is making America great again—some of them did it in Spanish! Yet only five of them—just five!—have the means to limp along through the summer.

That’s pretty embarrassing if you ask me. Fundraising is hugely important. Not only does it enable a campaign to keep going, but it indicates the level of excitement voters have for a candidate. After all, if you’re opening your wallet for someone, you really want them to win.

I guess there aren’t enough Americans eager to get one of these clowns into the White House.

Meanwhile, Donald Trump just made a stunning announcement about his team’s fundraising. In the second quarter of this year, they’ve brought in a whopping $100 million.

The Trump campaign in coordination with the Republican National Committee (RNC) raised more than $100 million in the second quarter, the president’s re-election campaign announced Monday…

The fundraising haul came largely through small donors. The Trump campaign said they received roughly 957,000 individual donations, with over 98% being $200 or less. The average donation was $41.48. [Source: Daily Caller]

Woah. Not only did Trump bring in over $100 million (in just the second quarter), but most of those donations came from small donors. Why is that crucial? Because Trump’s campaign isn’t being funded by deep pocket elitists.

He’s not dependent on powerful donors from Hollywood or big business. That means he will never have to bow to their whims. Trump is getting cash from regular Americans like you and me. He will always put our interests first.

This also tells us how enthusiastic Americans are about President Trump. Think about it, he raised over $100 million with donations averaging $40. That’s a lot of Americans opening their wallets!

As the media and liberals bicker over AOC and Pelosi, patriots are making sure Trump has the money to make it all the way to 2020. That should have his left-wing candidates very worried.

This weekend, Donald Trump roasted a collection of newbie Democrats in Congress. His fiery tweets sparked a storm of angry reactions from liberals in politics and the media. But there’s something pretty important their ignoring—to their ultimate peril.

In recent months, the media has spent a large portion of its time celebrating newcomers to Congress. These progressive, left-wing politicians—such as AOC, Ilhan Omar, and Rashida Tlaib—have accomplished nothing in the few months they’ve been in office. Nothing good, at least.

They have a reputation for insulting the United States, American citizens, and our way of life. Several of these women, as well as their allies, have come from foreign countries. They and their families fled to America for a better life. Yet now, as representatives, they trash our country and push an agenda that would ruin our economy and freedoms.

To the shock of all, the liberal media still celebrate these women as the future of our country, even as they spread anti-Semitism, support illegal immigration, and push for socialism.

President Trump called out these women on Twitter. In no uncertain terms, he totally roasted them.

So interesting to see “Progressive” Democrat Congresswomen, who originally came from countries whose governments are a complete and total catastrophe, the worst, most corrupt and inept anywhere in the world (if they even have a functioning government at all), now loudly……

….and viciously telling the people of the United States, the greatest and most powerful Nation on earth, how our government is to be run. Why don’t they go back and help fix the totally broken and crime infested places from which they came. Then come back and show us how….

….it is done. These places need your help badly, you can’t leave fast enough. I’m sure that Nancy Pelosi would be very happy to quickly work out free travel arrangements! [Source: Twitter]

Woah. Those are some strong words. Yet he makes a good point. Many of these congresswomen come from countries that horribly mistreat women. Countries that don’t protect their citizens’ rights (like free speech or freedom of religion). Their economies are in the gutter, not to mention the rampant crime.

There is a reason these women fled. Yet nobody tells them to stick a sock in it when they accuse the United States of racism or bigotry. These women play the race or gender card to get attention, but they’ve done nothing to make America a better place.

Of course, Democrats—instead of acknowledging these obvious facts—flipped out. Proving how thin-skinned and easily triggered they are, liberals raged over Trump’s pretty factual tweets.

Hollywood celebs and Democrats in D.C. spewed the same, tired attacks against Trump. Not once did they call out these congresswomen for bashing our country. Nor did they acknowledge the fact that women like Ilhan and Tlaib are do-nothings in Washington.

But the painful reality is that, once again, Trump is right. And internal polls from the Democratic Party prove Americans aren’t too happy with these women either.

“Ocasio-Cortez was recognized by 74% of voters in the poll; 22% had a favorable view,” Axios reported. “Rep. Ilhan Omar of Minnesota — another member of The Squad — was recognized by 53% of the voters; 9% (not a typo) had a favorable view.”

“Socialism was viewed favorably by 18% of the voters and unfavorably by 69%,” Axios added, whereas “capitalism was 56% favorable; 32% unfavorable.” [Source: Daily Wire]

Ouch, those are dismal numbers. I mean, even third parties have better numbers than that. In fact, the poll went on to say that if voters keep hearing about terrible AOC and her allies in Congress, Democrats are going to lose big in 2020.

Yet all we hear from the liberal media are stories about AOC, Omar, Tlaib and the rest of their left-wing gang. Democrats have no control over these untalented, un-American women.

They can rage over Trump’s tweets all they want. It looks like America agrees with him. And when America agrees with Trump, the left loses in a big way.

What liberals should be doing right about now is trying to find a way to get these freshmen congresswomen in line. But they won’t. They will make it all about Trump, giving him more attention and influence.

Gosh, it’s like the Democrats never want to win again.

Andrew Gillum, Democratic Socialist gubernatorial candidate defeated by Republican Ron Desantis in 2018, is apparently trying to shift votes in favor of the Democrats by registering more Dem. voters in Florida.

Last February, the anti-trump politician gave warning of the presence of “dark money” influencing his own race for governor. Now, the former Tallahassee mayor is using a private nonprofit to drive voter registration rather than his political committee.

Private nonprofits can get away with much less financial disclosure than political committees.

The Tampa Bay Times first reported on Gillum’s shady shift in financial tactics, saying:

“Gillum moved $500,000 from the political committee to the nonprofit last month, according to campaign finance reports filed Wednesday.

What Gillum does with that money will largely be shielded from public view. Unlike his political committee, which is required to itemize every expenditure and report it to the state each month, the nonprofit does not have to disclose its spending.

Nor will the nonprofit have to account for where it gets its money. The organization’s annual tax documents will be public, but those include far less information and it will be more than a year before they’re made available.”

The change came after the Tampa Bay Times reported in May that the FBI had subpoenaed records related to his 2018 gubernatorial campaign. This after Gillum’s time as Tallahassee mayor was tied to an FBI probe into city hall corruption, a federal investigation that involved undercover FBI agents going on trips with Gillum.

Joshua Karp, a spokesperson for Gillum, said the former mayor’s use of the nonprofit is because it “is allowed to directly spend money on voter registration efforts” in a manner that the political committee is not allowed to act.

“That fundraising is going very well, and we’re proceeding with vital investments in progressive infrastructure in this state,” Karp said.

Writing at the Tallahassee Democrat, Bill Cotterell, a columnist and former reporter for the newspaper, opined, “Taking political financing private may be legal, but looks wrong for Gillum.”

Cotterell continued:

“Even if you implicitly trust your leader not to tap into the organization’s piggy bank, even if you know the boss to be honest and dedicated to the lofty goals you’ve set out to attain, wouldn’t you still find it unsettling to be asked not to see the records?

Especially if the leader of your high-minded group is separately being investigated for some unknown financial irregularities, with federal subpoenas for past campaign documents? Especially if he just reached a $5,000 settlement with the Commission on Ethics in an unrelated case involving some lavish vacation travel and unreported goodies given him by lobbyist pals seeking favors from his city while he was mayor?”

Gillum sent out a mass email to his followers on Sunday, asking them to donate money in order to “stop Trump.”

Gillum’s message to supporters said, “The only way we can make sure we stop Trump is by beating him here in Florida, and to do that we need to register and reengage a million voters to flip Florida blue. That’s our plan, and it will work no matter how much money they spend here, but only if I can count on your help.”

Gillum recently announced his own Florida voter registration initiative committed to registering no less than one million new voters for 2020 while aiming to “evict Donald Trump” from the White House.

“We are going to commit ourselves to registering and engaging one million voters between now and 2020’s presidential election,” Gillum said at a recent event in Miami, addressing his new group which calls itself Bring It Home Florida.

“The road to the White House runs through Florida,” added Gillum. “We can deny Donald Trump a second term right here in the state of Florida.”

“How many states can you say, by themselves, have the ability to deny this man a return to the White House?” Gillum asked. “I can’t think of a bigger, better, more important state than the state of Florida, than for us to send that message.”

President Trump wanted to restore the citizenship question to the 2020 census. The question would reveal how many citizens, non-citizens, and illegal aliens actually live in this country. Obviously, Democrats fought to block him, taking it all the way to the Supreme Court. The president refuses to give up this goal and has unveiled a new plan.

It’s obvious why Democrats don’t want us to know how many citizens there are, right? The left has been encouraging illegal immigration for years. But why? Because they want these “undocumented” people counted as American citizens.

They give illegals jobs, housing, education, even government benefits. All so more will come and—although it’s illegal—vote for them. It’s why Democrats have turned major U.S. cities into sanctuaries for criminal aliens.

The more illegals flood these Democrat-controlled regions, the higher their populations rise. That means more representatives in Congress—and more electoral votes.

But what if we knew that millions of people living in liberal states weren’t Americans? Well, Democrats would lose out on quite a bit. The number of their reps in Congress would drop, they’d lose electoral votes, and they might even lose billions in federal aid.

Worse than that, it would give Trump more reason to deport illegals. And wake up more Americans to the threat illegal immigration poses to our country.

Democrats thought they won, after the Supreme Court delayed Trump’s attempt to add the question to the census. But yesterday, Trump dropped a whammy on the left, as he unveiled a more accurate method of finding out whose and American and who isn’t.

“Today, I will be issuing an executive order to put this very plan into effect immediately. I’m hereby ordering every department and agency in the federal government to provide the Department of Commerce with all requested records regarding the number of citizens and non-citizens in our country. They must furnish all legally accessible records in their possession immediately.

We will utilize these vast federal databases to gain a full, complete, and accurate count of the non-citizen population, including databases maintained by the Department of Homeland Security and the Social Security Administration.

We have great knowledge in many of our agencies. We will leave no stone unturned. The Census Bureau projected that using previously available records, it could determine citizenship for 90 percent of our population or more.” [Source: White House.gov]

Uh-oh! Democrats jumped out of the frying pan into the fire with this one.

They thought they won by using the courts to delay Trump’s agenda. But instead of adding a question to the census (where nothing stops a person from just lying about their citizenship), Trump will be harvesting the vast resources of federal agencies to get a clear number of how many U.S. citizens there actually are.

Honestly, he just has to count all the Social Security numbers that are still active. Every U.S. citizen has a valid SSN. Illegals don’t have them. Legal aliens don’t either. As long as the Social Security Administration can account for the deceased (and fraudulent cases), there is a verifiable number of real citizens.

Add to that other databases that can be used to double check the numbers, Trump has a count of American citizens that can’t be distorted by dishonest census entries.

Democrats really hurt themselves with this one. Had Obama not removed the question during his administration, they could have let the whole thing slide. Illegals could have just lied on the census, giving a fake number of citizens. But because the left so stubbornly denied Trump’s simple request, he now will get a much more accurate count.

You really didn’t think this one through, liberals. Haven’t you already learned that Trump doesn’t give up? Especially when it comes to protecting the American people? You’ve seen his track record over the last two-and-half years, right? He got Mexico to help protect our border, for goodness sake.

Did you really think he would lose this fight?

But you have to give Democrats a break. They live in a fantasy land where Trump is a Russian spy and Hillary Clinton is the rightful President of the United States. Most of their schemes fail, because they have no clue what’s going on.

Thank goodness they’re no longer in the White House.

For years, so-called sanctuary cities have openly violated federal law. They have put the well-being of criminal aliens and illegals ahead of American citizens. President Trump has warned these regions to start obeying immigration laws, or else. The Democrats who run these places have ignored him. Now, Trump is done playing games, as this plan is about to happen.

Fixing our broken immigration system has been one of Trump’s top priorities as president. He’s already done so much to help America—including the booming economy, low unemployment, a better military—you’d think everyone would be on board with his immigration reform.

Yet this one issue has turned out to be his toughest. That’s because Democrats have been protecting illegal immigrants for years. The left has rejected American labor unions and hard-working families to help a group that takes our jobs, invites crime into our communities, and drains government resources.

Even worse, Democrats refuse to let criminal aliens face the justice they deserve, by hiding them in their sanctuary cities.

As the border crisis continues, Trump is moving to hit Democrats right where it hurts. Last month, he authorized ICE to start deporting millions of illegal immigrants. He put that plan on hold, waiting for Congress to actually do their jobs.

Now, the wait is over. And thousands of illegals are about to get the boot.

Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents are preparing to conduct raids beginning Sunday to arrest thousands of illegal immigrants across the U.S. just weeks after President Trump announced that he was delaying the operation.

The ICE agents will target at least 2,000 immigrants whose deportations have already been ordered, a New York Times report said, citing one former and two current Department of Homeland Security officials…

The June operation was expected to target 2,000 families in as many as 10 cities, including Chicago, Baltimore, New York, Houston, Los Angeles and Miami. Last month, President Trump announced on Twitter that he wants ICE agents to start the process of “removing the millions of illegal aliens who have illicitly found their way into the U.S.” [Source: Fox News]

Specifics of the raids are being kept secret, to protect ICE agents. You might remember recently, when the mayor of Oakland betrayed the country by warning illegals of a coming raid. Her interference put ICE agents in danger and let hundres of illegals flee justice. ICE isn’t going to let that happen again.

We do know they are targeting sanctuary cities like Chicago, New York, Los Angeles and high-immigrant regions like Houston and Miami.

These are “innocent” immigrants who are just want a better life. These are people who broke the law and have been ordered to leave. Of course, they’ve refused, forcing ICE agents to risk their lives to apprehend and deport them.

You have to figure that these drastic steps are necessary, because of our weak immigration laws. Democrats have made it so that it’s easy for illegals to get in and hard for America to get them out. Immigration laws favor people who come here illegally—often dragging young children across dangerous regions—while neglecting legal immigrants and hurting hard-working Americans.

ICE wouldn’t have to conduct these raids, if catch-and-release and other Obama-era programs didn’t exist. If Congress bothered to follow the president’s lead and pass immigration reform, putting America’s needs first, these raids wouldn’t be necessary.

If they had helped provide funding for the wall, we wouldn’t have the crisis we are facing now.

But when have Democrats ever done anything to help Americans, not hurt us? I can’t remember.

The only good news is, despite overwhelming obstruction from the left, Trump is making good on his word. Parts of the wall are being built. More resources are being sent to secure the border. And ICE is deporting illegals who refuse to go.

Imagine what he could do, if Congress actually cared? But I guess that’s just crazy talk, huh?

The liberal media is working extra hard to try and push the false narrative that President Trump and alleged pedophile Jeffrey Epstein are BFFS even though Trump has been warning about Epstein for quite some time. It looks like instead the media puppets and their masters, the Democrats, should be looking inward.

An investigative journalist uncovered one of the Clinton’s many dirty little secrets, when she learned that former President Bill Clinton had flown on Jeffrey Epstein’s plane along with “underage girls” – often times leaving behind his Secret Service detail.

Epstein’s jet “Lolita Express” earned its name due to the fact that it was reportedly outfitted with a bed where passengers had group sex with young girls.

The Journalist, Conchita Sarnoff, told Fox News’ Shannon Bream about her discovery. Fox News’ Lukas Mikelionis reports that Sarnoff is the executive director of Alliance to Rescue Victims of Trafficking and is the author of the book “TrafficKing: The Jeffrey Epstein Case.” The Fox News segment followed the recent developments in the Epstein case that have occurred after the financier was arrested on Saturday on child sex trafficking charges.

Sarnoff made the remarks in response to the following statement from Clinton on Monday:

“President Clinton knows nothing about the terrible crimes Jeffrey Epstein pleaded guilty to in Florida some years ago, or those with which he has been recently charged in New York. In 2002 and 2003, President Clinton took a total of four trips on Jeffrey Epstein’s airplane: one to Europe, one to Asia, and two to Africa, which included stops in connection with the work of the Clinton Foundation. Staff, supporters of the foundation, and his Secret Service detail traveled on every leg of every trip.

He had one meeting with Epstein in his Harlem office in 2002, and around the same time made one brief visit to Epstein’s New York apartment with a staff member and his security detail. He’s not spoken to Epstein in well over a decade, and he has never been to Little St. James Island, Epstein’s ranch in New Mexico, or his residence in Florida”.

Sarnoff then went on to say, “I have read too much information and I have spoken to too many people on the inside. I actually attempted to interview Clinton but he did not agree to do so and I know from the pilot logs and these are pilot logs that you know were written by different pilots and at different times, that Clinton went, he was a guest of Epstein’s 27 times.”

“Many of those times Clinton had his Secret Service with him and many times he did not,” Sarnoff continued. “Almost every time that Clinton’s name is on the pilot logs there are underage girls there are initials and there are names of many many girls on that private plane.”

Bream then questioned Sarnoff, pointing out that Clinton’s statement did not match up with what she was saying. “Are you saying the former president is not telling the truth?” Bream asked Sarnoff.

“Yes, I’m saying, sadly, that he is not telling the truth,” Sarnoff responded.

A recently released report by the United Nations details thousands of murders committed by Venezuelan special forces with Venezuelan citizens as the victims. These forces, loyal to socialist President Nicholas Maduro, also notoriously altered evidence to make it look like the victims were resisting authority.

As The Miami Herald reported:

“Special Action Forces described by witnesses as “death squads” killed 5,287 people in 2018 and another 1,569 by mid-May of this year, in what are officially termed by the Venezuelan government “Operations for the Liberation of the People,” U.N. investigators reported. Laying out a detailed description of a lawless system of oppression, the report says the actual number of deaths could be much higher. It cites accounts by independent groups who report more than 9,000 killings for “resistance to authority” over the same period.”

The U.N. report stated:

“OHCHR (0ffice of the High Commissioner for Human Rights) documented cases of extrajudicial executions by security forces in the context of security operations conducted in poor neighbourhoods. Since early 2018, security operations by FAES, created to combat drug trafficking and criminal organizations, replaced the security operations known as “Operations for the Liberation of the People” implemented from 2015 to 2017. Interviewees consistently referred to FAES as a “death squad” or “extermination group.” NGOs have reported that the FAES is responsible for hundreds of killings …

Families of the victims described FAES breaking into their houses, taking their belongings, and exercising gender-based violence against women and girls, including forced nudity. They would separate young men from other family members before shooting them. According to their relatives, almost all of the victims had one or more shots in the chest. In every case, witnesses reported how FAES manipulated the crime scene and evidence. They would plant arms and drugs and fire their weapons against the walls or in the air to suggest a confrontation and to show the victim had “resisted authority.”

In many cases, FAES brought the victims to hospital even though they were already dead, apparently with the intention of manipulating the bodies and modifying the crime scene. In some cases, the authorities declared that the victims were criminals before the conclusion of a formal investigation. The authorities classify the killings resulting from security operations as “resistance to authority”. The number of these deaths is unusually high. In 2018, the Government registered 5,287 such killings, while the NGO “Observatorio Venezolano de la Violencia” (OVV) reported at least 7,523 killings under this category. Between 1 January and 19 May 2019, the Government reported 1,569 killings for “resistance to authority.” The OVV reported at least 2,124 of such killings between January and May 2019. Information analysed by OHCHR suggests many of these killings may constitute extrajudicial executions”.

The report added, “Thousands of people, mainly young men, have been killed in alleged confrontations with state forces during the past years. There are reasonable grounds to believe that many of these killings constitute extrajudicial executions committed by the security forces, particularly FAES. OHCHR is concerned that the authorities may be using FAES, and possibly other security forces, as part of a policy of social control. These killings warrant immediate investigation to ensure accountability of perpetrators and guarantees of non-recurrence.”

This is what happens when you give a government too much power and become as dependent on them as the citizens of a socialist society are. Starving citizens being killed off by their government is a common result of socialism.

The Democratic socialists within our government need to open their eyes and realize this before their terrible policies bring the U.S. to such a horrid place.

Despite heavy criticism from the usual crowd of robotic Trump haters, the President carried out a powerful display of American patriotism on this independence day.

“Today, we come together as one nation with this very special Salute to America,” a smiling Trump said. “We celebrate our history, our people, and the heroes who proudly defend our flag — the brave men and women of the United States military.”

Trump handled himself very well, all the while boasting about the historic accomplishments of the United States.

“Americans love our freedom and no one will ever take it away from us,” Trump said to chants of “U-S-A.” “Our nation is stronger today than it ever was before, it is stronger now stronger than ever.”

Trump’s speech was accented by the military might of the U.S., with flyovers from a variety of aircrafts ranging from the Air Forces F-22 Raptors and B-2 Stealth Bomber to the Navy’s F-18 Super Hornets and Army Apache helicopters.

“Today, just as it did 243 years ago, the future of American Freedom rests on the shoulders of men and women willing to defend it. As long as we stay true to our cause — as long as we remember our great history — and as long as we never stop fighting for a better future—then there will be nothing that America cannot do,” Trump said.

“We will never forget that we are Americans, and the future belongs to us,” he said. “We share one home, one heart and we are all made by one almighty God.”

Prior to the event, Trump sent out two tweets describing the celebration to come. “People are coming from far and wide to join us today and tonight for what is turning out to be one of the biggest celebrations in the history of our Country, SALUTE TO AMERICA, an all day event at the Lincoln Memorial, culminating with large scale flyovers of the most modern and advanced aircraft anywhere in the World. Perhaps even Air Force One will do a low & loud sprint over the crowd.”

Trump opponents criticized the cost of the event, never mind the fact that fireworks were donated to the tune of $750,000. Trump was quick to defend the cost of the event on Wednesday, tweeting that cost “will be very little compared to what it is worth.”

“We own the planes, we have the pilots, the airport is right next door (Andrews), all we need is the fuel,” he said, referring to Maryland’s Joint Base Andrews. “We own the tanks and all. Fireworks are donated by two of the greats.”

They also suggested that Trump was doing this as a “campaign stunt” and that Trump could be on the hook to reimburse the government if this was the truth.

Boy, did he prove them wrong.

Trump used the holiday instead to unite Americans. Issuing praise to the spirit that “runs through the veins of every American patriot.” He saw this as an opportunity to put a pause on the divisive politics that Americans face every day, and instead take us back to our roots, reminding us that at the end of the day we’re all on the same side.

President Trump intended to put a vital question on the upcoming, 2020 census. Democrats, as usual, sued to stop him. In a shocking move, the Supreme Court voted against Trump and stopped the question from being added. The president, undeterred, vows to move forward.

Democrats were terrified when they learned that President Trump wanted to put a simple question on the 2020 census: “Are you an American citizen?”

Seems like an obvious addition, right? I mean, shouldn’t that kind of question be on there already?

But it made Democrats very worried. Why? According to some reports, there are an estimated 11 million illegal aliens living in the United States. That number is big enough to have dramatic impacts on our census results.

The census determines how voting districts are laid out. It determines how many electoral votes a state gets, also how many representatives they get in the House. The census can also determine how much and what kind of federal aid is provided to states.

Clearly, you can see the left’s scheme. They wanted to use the high population of illegals in Democrat-dominated states to pump up their numbers. Democrats have encouraged illegal immigration for years, knowing that most of these aliens end up in California, New York, and other areas they want to dominate.

Those extra people numbered in the census will give them an artificial advantage. But if there was a question that exposed the truth—that many living in these areas are not Americans—it changes everything.

Everyone that fills out a census form that is not a citizen will not be counted toward our population. It would seriously hurt the left’s efforts to control our country illegally. So, they launched a lawsuit to stop Trump. Once again, the Democrats prove they are the party of lawlessness.

The case was taken all the way to the Supreme Court, where John Roberts sided with the liberal justices to knock down Trump’s question. Shocking, in my opinion. Now, the president is fighting back.

President Donald Trump proclaimed Wednesday his administration is “absolutely moving forward” with plans to add a question regarding citizenship to the 2020 census, branding statements to the contrary from administration officials as false.

“The News Reports about the Department of Commerce dropping its quest to put the Citizenship Question on the Census is incorrect or, to state it differently, FAKE!” President Trump wrote on Twitter. “We are absolutely moving forward, as we must, because of the importance of the answer to this question.”

President Donald Trump had said after the high court’s decision last week that he would ask his attorneys about possibly delaying next spring’s decennial census until the Supreme Court could revisit the matter.

On Twitter Tuesday night, President Trump wrote that the Supreme Court ruling marked a “very sad time for America.” He also said he had asked the Commerce and Justice departments “to do whatever is necessary to bring this most vital of questions, and this very important case, to a successful conclusion.” [Source: Breitbart]

The president is planning on delaying the census until the Supreme Court can look at new evidence provided by his attorneys. He is exploring all options to ensure this question remains on the census.

Only Democrats—and illegals—would not want this question on the census. We’re talking about a U.S. census. Its goal is to measure the population of our citizens—not the population of people here illegally.

Illegal aliens are a burden to our country. They jeopardize our jobs and national security. Yet Democrats want to treat them better than real citizens. It’s a crime.

President Trump refuses to let the Supreme Court’s shameful ruling give the left a win. Democrats want to undermine your will and freedom to pander to illegals. They care more about their support than yours.

But we need to let the president know we’re on his side. SHARE this story to let him know that we want the citizenship question on the census. The future of our country depends on it.

As we continue to learn more about the origins of the investigation into the Trump campaign new unexpected discoveries continue to arise. More evidence of collusion has been discovered involved with the 2016 election, but this time, it leads directly to Hillary Clinton.

During an interview with The Hill’s John Solomon, Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska acknowledged that he paid Christopher Steele (who was hired through an intermediary by the Clinton campaign to compile the infamous and discredited “Steele Dossier” alleging Team Trump colluded with Russia in 2016) for a research project.

“It was a research project to support one of the cases against me in London,” Deripaska told Solomon. “But my understanding was that lawyers trust him for some reason and he was for quite a time on retainer.”

Steele first began working for Deripaska in 2012, the oligarch, however, was not aware of the fact that Steele was working for the FBI.

The suggestion that Deripaska had paid Steele has been around for more than a year. In February 2018, Lee Smith published an article at Tablet Magazine that included a letter from then-Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Charles Grassley asking questions regarding Steele’s own connections to Russian officials.

The Trump administration levied sanctions against Deripaska and he is engaged in a legal battle with the State Department over them and his inability to get a visa to come to the U.S.

Solomon wrote, in a follow-up article to the interview, that Deripaska gave confirmation to a story he heard a year earlier from law enforcement sources which said that the FBI reached out to him in September 2016 for a “fishing” expedition to get dirt on the Trump campaign. The FBI sought after Deripaska because of his previous work history with former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort.

Solomon wrote:

“I told them straightforward, ‘Look, I am not a friend with him [Manafort]. Apparently not, because I started a court case [against him] six or nine months before … . But since I’m Russian I would be very surprised that anyone from Russia would try to approach him for any reason, and wouldn’t come and ask me my opinion,” he said, recounting exactly what he says he told the FBI agents that day.

“I told them straightforward, I just don’t believe that he would represent any Russian interest. And knowing what he’s doing on Ukraine for the last, what, seven or eight years.”

Solomon noted that Deripaska’s FBI interview was reportedly never given to Manafort’s attorneys. Manafort’s defense attorney, Kevin Downing, said the interview, which would be exculpatory evidence, was not handed over.

“Recent revelations by The Hill prove that the Office of Special Counsel’s (OSC) claim that they had a legitimate basis to include Paul Manafort in an investigation of potential collusion between the Trump presidential campaign and the Russian government is false,” Downing told Solomon.

“The failure to disclose this information to Manafort, the courts, or the public reaffirms that the OSC did not have a legitimate basis to investigate Manafort and may prove that the OSC had no legitimate basis to investigate potential collusion between the Trump presidential campaign and the Russian government.”

It should come as no surprise at this point that the Clintons have established connections to Russia as they have been known throughout their entire political careers to ruthlessly do whatever it takes to get what they want.

It’s time to lock her up!

Ad Blocker Detected!

Advertisements fund this website. Please disable your adblocking software or whitelist our website.
Thank You!