Sons of 1776


Although many Americans are against them, Schiff and the Democrats keep pushing their bogus impeachment inquiry. The left has stacked the deck, trying everything they can from preventing Republicans from having their say.

But one young rep from New York took it to Schiff and co. during recent hearings. And Trump noticed.

From the very start of these hearings, Adam Schiff has been pulling the strings. First, he held secretive, closed-door meetings that prevented information from reaching the public. But even now, with public hearings taking place, the Democrat refuses to give Republicans proper opportunity to question witnesses.

It’s a farce. Schiff knows these hearings will produce zero evidence against the president. So, he is openly fighting Republicans who just want a fair process.

One Republican had enough. She fought back as pathetic Schiff continued his games. And she even held one shady witness’s feet to the fire.

Stefanik took some public swipes at Schiff mocking him at Friday’s impeachment hearing by reading old tweets from when the House Intelligence Committee chairman vowed to have the Ukraine whistleblower testify before his panel. The two also clashed over House procedures…

At one point, Stefanik asked the ex-ambassador whether it was accurate that “defensive lethal aid” that she had pushed for was provided to Ukraine not by the Obama administration, but by the Trump administration.

“That’s correct,” Yovanovitch responded.

Stefanik also asked Yovanovitch about how the State Department under the Obama administration prepped her for her confirmation hearing by coaching her on how to handle questions about Hunter Biden’s role with Burisma Holdings, the Ukrainian energy company that had been the subject of an investigation. [Source: Fox News]

Stefanik boldly took on the swamp all by herself. She refused to let Schiff bully her into silence. When questioning the former ambassador—who has tried to throw Trump the bus—she exposed the facts the ambassador was trying to cover up. Like how the Obama administration denied aid to Ukraine that Trump provided. And how the Obama administration told Yovanovitch what to say about Hunter Biden—which contradicts stories that Obama knew nothing about Hunter’s relationship with Ukraine.

Even Trump took notice of how Stefanik was taking down the left’s scheme. He mentioned her on Twitter, announcing a new star is born.

Adam Schiff continues to conduct these meetings unfairly. He twists testimony of “witnesses” to make it seem like President Trump is guilty. When Republicans simply want to get to the bottom of the truth, their time is cut short, they are interrupted, and they are bullied. He did this frequently to Stefanik throughout the entire process.

Funny how a party that pretends to care about women’s rights—who claim to be feminists—has no problem with Schiff harassing a female member of Congress when she’s doing her job. Schiff frequently interrupted Stefanik, in a clear attempt to prevent her from speaking.

But they accuse Trump of intimidation—and he wasn’t even there!

You don’t have to be a genius to see these hearings for what they are: a circus. The left has zero evidence to back their wild claims that Trump broke the law. Everything we’ve seen since day one of this impeachment sham has showed us that Democrats are grasping at straws.

Schiff’s ridiculous treatment of Stefanik and other Republicans proves how desperate he’s become. But leaders like Stefanik aren’t letting the Democrats push them around. This entire impeachment charade has given Republicans an opportunity to not only stand up for our president, but our entire country.

It’s no surprise that Trump was cheering on Stefanik. If she continues to show that kind of integrity and leadership skill, she will continue to be a star on the right. Others will hopefully follow her lead. We need many more people like her in Congress. Then, perhaps, we won’t have to keep calling it a swamp!

Once upon a time, the liberal media adored the “Squad,” four far-left, freshmen Democrats in Congress. These women accomplished nothing but strife, but were still celebrated by the MSM for “opposing” Donald Trump. But one of these women—known for wild outbursts—is facing trouble of her own. And it could land her a one-way ticket out of Congress.

Rashida Tlaib is a member of the “squad,” which includes such heroes as anti-Semite Ilhan Omar and numbskull “Democratic socialist” Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. Tlaib has as little to her list of accomplishments as these other women—expect for her irrational hatred for the President of the United States.

She once banded with Omar to push a bill that would have allowed U.S. companies to boycott the nation of Israel. It would have been the first time the U.S. openly supported the BDS movement—a global attempt to cripple and destroy the one Jewish state in the world. Thankfully, even House Democrats knocked down her attempt.

Tlaib is also known for her wild temper, that got her thrown out of a Trump event. Early in the 2016 Election, Donald Trump appeared in Michigan for a meeting with local business owners. Tlaib, a local politician, was there as well. Before Trump could even begin his remarks, Tlaib made an outburst.

Screaming and cursing, she was forcibly removed from the event. She has continued to use foul language to describe the president, proving how unprofessional she is.

But now her reputation is utterly tarnished, as a new ethics investigation has been revealed. Turns out, the House discovered messages from Tlaib where she begged her campaign to give her money for personal use.

The House Ethics Committee on Thursday released a trove of striking internal campaign communications sent in 2018 by Michigan Democratic Rep. Rashida Tlaib, in which Tlaib urgently requested money from her congressional campaign to defray personal expenses — and, a government watchdog said, possibly violated federal law in the process…

The document dump was related to the committee’s ongoing ethics probe into Tlaib, which the panel said on Thursday would be “expanded” based on a referral from the Office of Congressional Ethics (OCE)…

Texts and emails released by the Ethics Committee show Tlaib frantically contacting members of her staff for financial help. [Source: Fox News]

You can be as foul-mouthed and hateful as can be and apparently, the House won’t care. But violate campaign financing laws and they’ll be all over you like ants on a picnic.

Tlaib’s lawyers claim what she was requesting were well within the bounds of the law. Yet according to the messages, she was demanding very large sums of money. In fact, in one message, she wanted 2 grand a week, up to $12,000. In another text, she requested a one-time payout of $5,000.

What kind of personal expenses does she have that requires $2,000 a week? That’s higher than many people’s monthly rent. She claimed it was for “necessities.” Hmm… I’m not buying it. And neither is the Ethics Committee.

Tlaib’s campaign committee, Rashida Tlaib for Congress, allegedly “reported campaign disbursements that may not be legitimate and verifiable campaign expenditures attributable to bona fide campaign or political purposes,” according to a release from OCE that unanimously recommended the Ethics Committee investigate Tlaib. [Source: Fox News]

Federal law is pretty strict about what you can do with campaign funds. For good reason. We don’t want politicians raising millions from Americans—thinking its for an election—only to drop out and pocket the cash. Imagine the chaos that would ensure.

Seems like, though, Tlaib tried to skirt the law to cash in on the large sums of money her campaign was pulling in. If she’s found guilty of breaking the law, she’s in for some serious trouble.

Not that I’m surprised in the least. Let’s just hope she doesn’t slink away, like so many other Democrats.

Democratic Socialist Elizabeth Warren is trying to turn Americans against other Americans. Her campaign recently released a video, attacking some of the country’s top business people and billionaires. She wants to punish the rich with massive taxes, thinking the rest of us are on board with it. But some of these Americans fired back. They put Warren in her place.

Do you hate the rich? If you’re a miserable, misinformed Democrat, you might say yes. But the reality is, wealthy Americans are an example for the rest of us. Their success proves that anyone can achieve their dreams in this land of opportunity.

Nowhere else in the world can regular people start a business, take risks, and in a short time, achieve such wealth and status. Not everyone will become a billionaire in their lifetime, but don’t you want the chance to try? You might end up very successful, thanks to your hard work and determination.

Democrats like Elizabeth Warren (the left’s presidential frontrunner) think we should be punishing these rich people for their success. She wants to overtax the wealthy, taking their hard-earned money and giving it to bureaucrats (taxes never go to those in need, but flunkies in the government!). Instead of inspiring all Americans to work hard to provide for their families, Elizabeth Warren wants to rob some of us—to enrich the federal government.

She’s no Robin Hood, my friends. She’s a female Karl Marx, a con artist pretending to be our friend.

And she’s forgetting these “evil” billionaires are the ones starting new businesses and creating jobs for the rest of us.

Several billionaires decided to fire back. They let the country know just how dishonest and manipulative this Democratic frontrunner is being.

Billionaire Leon Cooperman, a highly successful investor, lashed out at Democrat presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren… saying, “In my opinion she represents the worst in politicians as she’s trying to demonize wealthy people… She’s disgraceful. She doesn’t know who the f*** she’s tweeting. I gave away more in the year than she has in her whole f***ing lifetime.” [Source: Daily Wire]

Woah, those are some strong words. But he’s got a point. As Democrats like Warren wrongfully accuse the rich of being greedy, many—if not all—of them give back in big ways. Yet Warren still wants to deprive them of their wealth. All their money will go to government agencies, which will proceed to throw it down the drain.

A few more Americans chimed in.

Chase Bank CEO Jamie Dimon said he thought it was a bad idea that Warren was demonizing wealthy people… “you shouldn’t vilify people who worked hard to accomplish things. And so my comment is, I think it’s American society – we’re just attacking each other all the time.”

Mark Cuban also blasted Warren… “But the Senator is like every other candidate. She is selling shiny objects to divert attention from reality… The reality for @ewarren is that this is as much to divert attention from her income and net worth as anything else… Intellectually she knows she is misleading the public. That the chances of getting all the necessary line items she needs for M4All approved within 4 years are nearly impossible.” [Source: Daily Wire]

Cuban brings up an important point. Warren (like Bernie Sanders) is one of the richest politicians on the planet. She goes on and on attacking the rich, hoping you’ll forget that she is as rich as they come. Sure, she might not be as rich as Cuban or Cooperman, but she’s got the bucks, baby.

Will she be getting taxed heavily under her own plan? Something tells me, no. Warren wants to blast job creators, while she pockets more and more cash.

Funny how that always happens when Democrats are in charge.

The fact remains that Warren’s entire platform is to turn Americans against other Americans. The media accuses Trump of dividing us, when it’s Democrats that do the most damage.

Hey Warren, instead of attacking billionaires, why not encourage them to invest in America? Get them to help their fellow citizens with jobs?

Hmm… I guess that’s all crazy talk, huh?

After a month of bogus closed-door meetings, House Democrats have been forced to conduct public impeachment inquiry hearings. But even as their scheme to keep this secret has ended, they continue to pull the strings, ensuring Trump has been denied due process. While most of the media is on their side, one outlet has called out these hearings for what they really are: a sham.

Anyone with a brain knows that Donald Trump did nothing wrong. His phone call with the Ukrainian president was free of any pressure, bribery, or quid-pro-quos. The transcript proved the whistleblower’s attacks against Trump were completely false.

So, why this impeachment inquiry? Democrats Adam Schiff and Nancy Pelosi went out on a limb to support impeachment. They are searching for “witnesses” who will say Trump broke the law, despite the evidence proving the opposite.

They conducted closed-door meetings for a month, so that the facts would reach the public. We are seeing some of the transcripts from those meetings and are learning that nobody was able to provide proof that Trump broke the law. This impeachment push is shaping up much like the Russian witch hunt hoax.

After pressure from Republicans and the White House, Schiff was forced to start public hearings. The media wants to spin them as the “beginning of the end” for President Trump (something they’ve been saying since his Inauguration). But one national paper was quick to humiliate the left with a perfect image.

The New York Post released its Wednesday cover late on Tuesday night mocking Democratic House leaders ahead of their public impeachment hearings of President Donald Trump over his July 25 phone call with Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky…

“Operating in darkness, where he controlled the witness list and leaked snippets of testimony that the Dems’ media echo chamber turned into proof of Trump’s guilt, Schiff has been a first-rate illusionist,” Goodwin continued. Even his exterior calmness is deceptive; he burns with a zeal to kill the king.” [Source: Daily Wire]

As other outlets claim Trump is doomed, the New York Post is calling this impeachment inquiry for what it really is: a circus.

The Democrats have declared Trump guilty long before any evidence has come out. They set out their goal before anything even reached the public. We know this “whistleblower” was colluding with Adam Schiff’s office in secret. Adam Schiff read out a false version of the phone call during the first hearing. It’s clear the left is simply trying to smear Trump. They are not at all interested in finding out the truth.

While Schiff and his fellow travelers loudly declare Trump guilty, they’ve yet to settle on a charge that makes sense to the many millions of Americans who live outside a political hot house. [Source: New York Post]

Democrats are just playing a game, but one that will affect the entire country. They want to remove a president just because they don’t like him. Just because he has the guts to actually put Americans first, not the lobbyist-controlled D.C. swamp.

The New York Post lays it out perfect with this, “The conclusion has always come first — get Trump — then create a justification by weaving a few thin threads together into a noose.” Democrats are declaring Trump a criminal—then they hope to find evidence to back it.

It is a violation of the president’s rights and an insult to our system of justice. Democrats are ignoring our values as a country, over partisan politics. They want to take down a president over nothing. They know their candidates for 2020 are all duds. The chances that one of them will steal the White House are the same as a snowball’s chances in hell.

This is why they are trying to impeach Donald Trump. They think that with him gone, they will have a better chance in 2020. As usual, they are dreaming.

Whatever happens during the public hearings, remember this: Democrats aren’t interested in the truth. They are running a circus to deceive Americans.

But something tells me this will fail, as all their other plans have in the past.

After years of debate, the immigration “policy” set by Obama is finally reaching the Supreme Court. The highest court in the land will decide if DACA is legal—and what will happen to over 600,000 illegals living in the U.S. President Trump called out the Dems Twitter, making a promise if the Supreme Court gives a ruling.

It’s been a long time since the media has talked about DACA. The truth is, the left doesn’t really care about this 660,000 illegal immigrants who came to America as children. The policy—which was never passed by Congress—allowed these people to stay. A better way to put it: Obama just deferred their deportations to a later date.

President Trump has called on Congress numerous times to craft legislation that address DACA for good. Trump has made it clear that he isn’t interested in deporting hard-working, decent people. Yet Democrats in Congress have refused him every time.

It’s as if they don’t want to help people in need—only obstruct progress!

DACA is set to finally reach the Supreme Court. Their decision might invalidate Obama’s out-dated and faulty policy. It would mean that 660,000 people would be forced to leave the United States with no alternative.

The Supreme Court on Tuesday is set to take up the Trump administration’s plan to end protections that shield about 660,000 immigrants from deportation, and legal experts say all eyes will be on the likely tie-breaker Chief Justice John Roberts.

Created under an Obama-era executive order, DACA gives some undocumented immigrants brought to the U.S. as children the chance to receive a renewable two-year period of deferred action from deportation and become eligible for a work permit…

Trump has said a ruling in his favor would force Democrats back to the table and a “bipartisan deal will be made to the benefit of all.” [Source: Fox News]

The Supreme Court might rule in favor of DACA, but that only means these illegals would still be in limbo. They wouldn’t get to stay here legally, nor would they become citizens. But if the SCOTUS overruled DACA, it would give the president and Congress a chance to craft a permanent solution.

President Trump has long championed a merit-based immigrant process. That means immigrants would have to prove they can work hard and contribute to this country. Democrats want immigrants who will become a burden to our welfare systems. They don’t want people who would make America better.

Which is exactly why so many criminals and freeloaders flood the border every year.

President Trump took to Twitter to make a promise over the DACA decision.

Many of the people in DACA, no longer very young, are far from “angels.” Some are very tough, hardened criminals. President Obama said he had no legal right to sign order, but would anyway. If Supreme Court remedies with overturn, a deal will be made with Dems for them to stay! [Source: Twitter]

As usual, Trump doesn’t sugar-coat the facts. Many DACA recipients are the same criminals that endanger American lives. The same that would not be here if we had a border wall.

But he also promises that if the Supreme Court ends DACA, it will mean a better deal that can help some illegals stay.

How? If Congress actually wakes up and does their job, they can cooperate with the Trump administration and come up with a merit-based system.

If these DACA recipients want to stay in the U.S., wouldn’t the be willing to follow new rules to prove their ability to work? If they are simply here for free government benefits, maybe they shouldn’t stay?

Democrats are terrified of this. That’s why they’ve refused to work with Trump over this issue for the last three years. They are content to keep DACA recipients stuck in this limbo, ever afraid of getting deported.

But if the SCOTUS ends DACA, they’ll have no choice. Democrats will be forced to come up with a solution, or all those people will be deported. Are Democrats so selfish and Trump-hating that they’d let so many people down?

I guess we’ll find out.

It’s no secret that House Democrats have turned the impeachment inquiry into a circus. They claim Donald Trump broke the law, but reject any basic rights for his due process.

Republicans nor the president are able to even question the whistleblower who started all this. Because of that, Sen. Lindsey Graham has a very stark prediction about what will happen, if impeachment reaches the Senate.

Despite what the media claims, if the House votes to impeachment the president, that’s not the end of the story. In fact, it’s just the beginning. The House has the power to bring articles of impeachment against the president. But it does not have the power to remove him from office.

That’s a pretty important point, one that the media is trying to ignore. Because if the House votes to impeach Donald Trump, the case moves to the Republican-controlled Senate.

But what will Republican Senators do?

Many so-called experts have argued over what Republicans in the Senate would do if Trump was impeached. Some say they will not vote to remove him from office. Others say there are a few Republicans will to vote against the man making America great again.

Sen. Lindsey Graham has a pretty serious take on the matter. Because of how the Democrats have been playing this game, he openly declared impeachment would be “dead on arrival.”

Republican South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham said Sunday that any impeachment trial that does not include access to the whistleblower would be “dead on arrival in the Senate.”

“They could care less about getting to the truth, what really did happen…” Graham responded…

“It’s impossible to bring this case forward in my view fairly without us knowing who the whistleblower is and having a chance to cross examine them about any advice they may have, if they don’t call the whistleblower in the house, this thing is dead on arrival on the Senate.” [Source: Daily Wire]

Rumors are circulating over the identity of the whistleblower. But up until now, the Democrats refuse to reveal his name, nor is the whistleblower willing to testify and face the man he is accusing. That violates the president’s basic rights of due process.

Democrats are trying to frame the president—making him guilty until proven innocent. Boy, they love doing that (see: Brett Kavanaugh). They still think they can make up the rules as they go along, believing the liberal media will spread rumors and lies as fact.

It seems, though that the Senate isn’t buying it. Nor are the American people. We can see this impeachment push for the charade that it really is. Democrats aren’t interested in finding the truth. They are simply trying to undo the results of the 2016 Election.

They think that they can stir up as much dirt against Trump as possible, to hurt his re-election chances.

But there is one thing they aren’t counting on. Impeachment might be DOA if it reaches the Senate. That would be the best case scenario for the Democrats.

If not, the Senate will conduct an open hearing. That means President Trump will finally get the chance to defend himself.

Just imagine what will come to light then? Maybe the details relating to what Joe Biden was really up to? Trump and his defense team will easily expose how Biden pressured Ukraine to fire a man investigating his son. That is a much bigger scandal than anything Trump has been accused of.

And what other skeletons will come out of the left’s closet? Donald Trump will have free reign to say whatever he wants in his defense. Plus, many Democrats will be forced to testify in open court—including Pencil Next Schiff.

If Democrats were smart, they would drop this impeachment push immediately. But they’re not. They are going to try to vote on impeaching Trump soon. If it does go to the Senate, the Democrats will be obliterated.

Something will be dead on arrival, and it will be the Democratic Party.

For months now, we’ve watched numerous Democrats fight for the 2020 nomination. Right now, several of them are finally dropping out, their campaigns out of gas. But just as it seemed the party is getting close to a decision, news comes out that yet two more candidates might be joining the race. Better grab your aspirin.

It’s no secret that the 2020 Democratic lineup is pathetic. There’s not a single star candidate among the far-left contenders. The most moderate of them is Joe Biden—yet even he is pushing views that the average American would consider radical. The rest are self-proclaimed socialists, promising massively expensive government programs, not to mention policies that would destroy our national security.

You have to wonder how any of these people think they can beat Donald Trump to take the White House. Even with the left’s pathetic, ongoing smear campaign called the impeachment inquiry, not a single 2020 candidate has what it takes to beat the president.

Not long ago, rumors swirled that big liberal donors met in New York to discuss other options. They floated around the names of other potential candidates—people they thought would do better in 2020.

Well, it seems like they might have gotten to a few people, because news is coming out that more Democrats are joining the 2020 fight.

Former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg appears to be seriously considering entering the 2020 race for president.

Bloomberg is expected to file paperwork this week designating himself as a candidate in Alabama’s Democratic presidential primary, Fox News has learned…

Bloomberg’s expected move has come amid increasing concern about the leftward drift of the major Democratic candidates, the departure of candidates who failed to gain traction – and talk of other potential late entries. [Source: Fox News]

Former New York Mayor (and former Republican) Michael Bloomberg is very close to jumping into the 2020 race. Bloomberg is a turncoat. He ran as a Republican for his first term as New York mayor, to get the endorsement of Rudy Giuliani. But he quickly became an independent and burdened New York with terrible policies.

He turned the once prosperous, booming city into a nanny-state that rewarded the rich and punished regular folks. Now, this billionaire elitist who spent millions to interfere with out-of-state elections wants to do the same to the entire country.

Yet he is considered a moderate compared to the rest of the clowns!

I find it hilarious that this East Coast snob thinks he can win over voters in Alabama.

But then there’s this news.

Former U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder is again considering running for the Democrat nomination for president in 2020 after previously ruling out a run, a move that comes as former New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg has filed presidential primary paperwork in Alabama signaling he may be a late entrant to the race. [Source: Breitbart]

Most people probably don’t even remember Eric Holder. He was the terrible Attorney General that was responsible for Obama’s “Fast and Furious” scheme where the U.S. government sold weapons to Mexican drug cartels. That program resulted in two murdered Border Patrol agents and countless murdered Mexican officers.

And this guy thinks he can beat Donald Trump!

These men were two of the names floated by the rich liberal donors. Seems like powerful figures within the Democratic Party were able to bend their arms to run.

Hmm… super-rich elitists are forcing Democrats to run? Wow, such patriotism! Such love for country!

These men are running, not because they want to help America—but because the swamp is making them!

Tells you all you need to know about Democrats in 2019, huh?

All this is happening because the liberal party has no real leaders. They’ve abandoned their values (whatever they had) and the American people to cater to globalists in China and around the world. None of them believe in the American dream. None of them really want to make America great.

And all of them will lose to Donald Trump.

Elizabeth Warren—the supposed 2020 Democratic frontrunner—has been promising universal healthcare in the form of “Medicare for all.” But her socialist “free” healthcare will cost Americans over $52 trillion. Many, even liberals, have criticized the plan by saying it will hurt the middle class. Now, 2016 presidential loser Hillary Clinton weighed in. Warren can’t be too happy right now.

The 2020 Democratic primary so far has been nothing short of a circus. There has not been a single candidate that can inspire Americans to vote for them. They’re all duds, plain and simple. Two of the top contenders are self-proclaimed socialists, who want to burden America with insanely costly healthcare plans.

We thought Bernie Sanders’ $32 trillion plan was bad. But then Elizabeth Warren unveiled her plan, which will cost our country $52 trillion over just ten years. The irony of a “free” healthcare program is that it’s not even remotely free. This program will be funded through heavy taxes. Warren says not a single tax will affect the middle class. Sure, we’re buying that.

It’s impossible for such a massive program to not hit most Americans with new and painful taxes. Do you want a larger chunk of your paycheck being taken to pay for subpar healthcare? I doubt it. Yet that is what you’re going to get if Warren gets elected.

Plenty of Democrats have already criticized Warren’s plan, including Joe Biden. But he has to criticize it, since he’s running against her. He also helped craft the failed Obamacare program and even though it’s terrible, he can’t abandon it.

But recently, failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton weighed in on the issue. I’m sure most liberals were expecting her to back the leading female candidate for president. Instead, she threw Warren’s plan under the bus.

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton poured cold water Wednesday on Sen. Elizabeth Warren’s Medicare for All plan and said she doubts the $52 trillion proposal could ever be enacted.

“I don’t believe we should be in the midst of a big disruption while we are trying to get to 100% coverage and deal with costs,” Clinton said at an event The New York Times hosted…

Clinton said she would support a debate on any universal health care plan, but that it was not politically feasible.

“You just don’t think that that plan would ever get enacted?” Aaron Ross Sorkin, the event moderator, asked.

“No, I don’t. I don’t.” [Source: Daily Caller]

Ouch. There had been rumors that Hillary Clinton was aiding Warren’s campaign—after she was seen at several of her events. It wouldn’t be too much of a stretch to believe Clinton was lending Warren a helping hand to secure the nomination.

But Clinton just torched Warren’s signature campaign promise. With Clinton rejecting Medicare for All, Warren will have a harder time convincing liberal voters to back it.

There are plenty of Democrats who still look to Clinton as some kind of leader. Nevermind she failed to secure the White House—twice. The former Secretary of State still carries weight with some voters. For her to reject Warren’s plan is bad news for the 2020 “frontrunner.”

It also proves just how deep the divides are among Democrats. They just can’t get on board with any plan. Some want radical leftist policies. Others are trying to be slightly moderate. The only thing they can agree on is that they hate Donald Trump. Imagine my shock.

Sorry, guys, that’s not a winning strategy. If you want to take the White House in 2020, you have to offer voters something better than what Trump is doing. He’s scoring major wins on almost every issue.

Meanwhile, Democrats are promising programs that will bankrupt our country and destroy our prosperity.

After all, when Hillary Clinton is the voice of reason in your party… you’re in big trouble!

The left’s ongoing impeachment charade was all started by a nameless whistleblower. After over a month, the American public still doesn’t know who this person is. Democrats refuse to reveal the accuser’s name—making it impossible for Trump to build a defense. Sen. Rand Paul has had enough of the left’s games. He promised to do this one thing to the whistleblower, ending his scheming once and for all.

If you’ve gotten tired trying to keep track of this impeachment circus, let me break it down for you. House Democrats are accusing Trump of trying to force Ukraine into helping him hurt Joe Biden. They claim he threatened Ukraine, offering aid in exchange for their help in investigating something Biden did as vice president.

(We know Biden forced Ukraine to do as he demanded or lose $1 billion. Pretty bad.)

Democrats are using an unnamed whistleblower’s complaint as “evidence” that Trump did something wrong. Yet the whistleblower wasn’t on the call. Nor did he learn about the call from someone with first-hand knowledge.

In fact, much of what the whistleblower claimed happened during the call was disproven by the transcript. Trump himself released the transcript, proving he did not threaten or pressure Ukraine.

Yet the Democrats keep pushing this impeachment inquiry, interviewing “witnesses” as if there was a real crime.

Even now, the whistleblower who started this nonsense is hiding behind lawyers. This man plunged our system into chaos, but is too cowardly to show his face. Sen. Rand Paul has had enough. And he’s promising to out this person, once and for all.

Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) revealed on Tuesday that he may reveal the identity of the Ukraine whistleblower while speaking to a group of reporters and then doubled down on it later in the evening during an appearance on Fox News…

“Yeah. And there’s something important, also. It’s called the Constitution. The Sixth Amendment to the Constitution says if you are going to accuse me of a crime, I get to stare you down in court,” Paul continued. “That is absolutely part of the Constitution. The statute might say one thing, but, I promise you, if there is a trial, you always get to confront your accuser. It’s in the Sixth Amendment. It’s in the Bill of Rights. There’s no way they can stop the defense from asking for that.”

“But I can do [reveal the identity of the whistleblower] right now, if I want. Nothing stops me. There is no law that stops me from doing it, other than that I don’t want to make it about the one individual,” Paul continued. [Source: Daily Wire]

This is pretty key. This whistleblower is accusing Trump of a serious crime. So serious that the left is trying to remove him from office. Yet this man cannot show his face to the accused? I don’t think so.

His lawyers claim he’s hiding to protect himself from violence and that Paul would expose him to danger.

Um… excuse me? Rand Paul knows full well about that. He was in danger, twice.

“I’ve been the victim of political violence not once, but twice. I was there at the ballfield when Steve Scalise was almost killed… I had six of my ribs broken by a hater of President Trump. So, I know what political violence is all about… But there’s no law that prevents me from mentioning the name of who’s been said to be the whistleblower.” [Source: Daily Wire]

This is the one man they can’t accuse of exposing the whistleblower to violence. Rand Paul was attacked outside his home after the left doxxed his personal information. He was there when a liberal gunman attacked Republicans on a baseball field. His intentions are not to endanger this whistleblower (as CNN would do), but to force him to be held accountable.

We know this man is a liberal. He worked for Obama. And his lawyers are Clinton cronies. Once we know his name, we’ll see this impeachment push as the con it is.

That’s why the left is fighting to hide him. And that’s why Rand Paul is done with games.

The whistleblower—the unnamed person that started the impeachment chaos—recently offered to answer questions from Republicans, but only in written form. The GOP rejected this offer as yet another attempt by the left to manipulate the inquiry. President Trump weighed in, also rejecting this obvious scheme. He then went on to say certain details about the whistleblower causing us to ask: does he already know who it is?

I’m sure you’re tired of hearing about the shadowy “whistleblower” who the left used to start their impeachment. But we still have to talk about him. This person took it upon themselves to kick up a dust storm that affects every last American. He submitted a complaint—that was mostly inaccurate—that the Democrats are using to try to remove your president from office.

So yeah, this guy is pretty important.

What’s even more shocking is that, still, his identity is a secret. This person has accused the president of crimes, yet he is too cowardly to show his face. In our system of justice, an American has the right to confront their accuser. It’s a part of our due process.

Yet Democrats refuse to let President Trump and the GOP openly question this person. It is a shocking violation of Trump’s rights. But when has the left ever cared about things like justice and equal rights (for conservatives)?

President Trump joined with the GOP to reject the whistleblower’s “generous” offer to answer their questions in writing. This is an insulting offer, which prevents Republicans from properly questioning this accuser. In fact, Donald Trump called out that scheme and even said a few things that have raised our eyebrows.

“The Whistleblower gave false information and dealt with corrupt politician [Adam] Schiff,” Trump tweeted Monday (formatting adjusted). “He must be brought forward to testify. Written answers not acceptable!”

As Politico reports, Trump edged closer Sunday to revealing the alleged identity of the whistleblower, which RealClearInvestigations’ Paul Sperry describes as “an open secret inside the Beltway.”

“There have been stories written about a certain individual, a male, and they say he’s the whistleblower,” Trump told White House reporters Sunday. “If he’s the whistleblower, he has no credibility because he’s a [John] Brennan guy, he’s a Susan Rice guy, he’s an Obama guy. And he hates Trump.”

“Now, maybe it’s not him,” Trump added. “But if it’s him, you guys ought to release the information.” [Source: Daily Wire]

Woah, what? The whistleblower’s identity is an “open secret” in D.C.? This is shocking, but not surprising. The D.C. swamp often knows things they refuse to reveal to the American public. All because it would be too damaging to their corrupt agenda.

That tells you something. A culture so prone to leak damaging info is collectively keeping the whistleblower’s name a secret. Yet Trump seems to already know. He called out this partisan hack as a buddy of Trump-hating John Brennan and Obama ally Susan Rice. Trump is suggesting this “whistleblower” is everything we suspect he is: an Obama-era crony that is attacking Trump over partisan bitterness.

So why not come out and expose him? President Trump might know, but he’s demanding the same fair treatment every American deserves. The Democrats have to be the ones to reveal the identity, or the whistleblower himself must do so. The longer they wait (while pushing this impeachment inquiry), the more outrageous and un-Constitutional this process becomes.

Democrats are only burying themselves by pushing an impeachment that is violating basic rules of due process. They are attempting to try Trump without a formal investigation, indictment, or even basic transparency. Everything they are doing is against our establish values of innocence until proven guilty.

Do they think the American people will be on board with that? Of course not. Trump is the first president in decades to actually make good on his promises. Americans are thriving, thanks to his policies. Nobody in their right mind wants him gone.

Unless the Democrats either end this impeachment now or reveal the whistleblower’s name—they are done for.

For good.

Ad Blocker Detected!

Advertisements fund this website. Please disable your adblocking software or whitelist our website.
Thank You!