Sons of 1776


The Social Security program is vital link in supporting retired Americans. But all too often, the program is exploited by fraudsters. Now we’ve learned of a shocking report that reveals millions of dollars have been wasted. You won’t believe where they went.

There are more than a few critics of the Social Security Administration. The program was designed to help Americans in need, especially senior citizens who can no longer work. The idea was that a person would “pay into” the program for 30-40 years. When they retired, they would have a nestegg from the government to fall back on.

It never worked out that way. Social Security takes plenty from workers’ paychecks, but dishes out very little for our retired Americans. Worse than that, crooks have found many ways to cheat the system. The most common way is by simply stealing the Social Security Numbers of retired Americans. Many elderly are conned over the phone by these crooks; they often just give out their numbers.

But a new report has revealed that a shocking amount of money—tens of millions—has been lost to crooks. How? It was given out, to dead people.

The Office of the Inspector General (IG) at the Social Security Administration (SSA) has released a March 2019 internal audit that sought to determine whether the SSA has been doling out benefits to dead people in Maryland and Michigan. The answer, as it turns out, is a resounding “yes.” Overall, the IG found that the SSA had paid out nearly $42 million to about 500 dead people…

As The Daily Caller also notes, a separate Texas-specific SSA audit found that nearly $25 million in Social Security payments had been given to 336 dead Texans. [Source: Daily Wire]

$42 million is no chump change. That is taxpayer money, being paid out to dead people. Now, you might be wondering how they can make this kind of error. Where is the money going?

Obviously not to the dead people. It’s yet another scam, draining money from people who could actually use it. Crooks acquire the Social Security Numbers of dead people—sometimes even from friends or relatives. They then collect benefits that would have gone to the dead person—if they were alive. Often these crooks aren’t even retired themselves and aren’t entitled to payments. In one case, a woman was collecting payments from someone who had died in 2000.

In another instance, a person had been collecting checks for a dead person since 1997. The person died in 1974.

This is shocking. That money was taken from hard-working Americans. It was meant to help elderly Americans who are in need, but cannot work anymore. Instead, these thieves were cashing checks and spending the money on themselves.

But how is this possible? How could a person be taking checks for over 20 twenty years, using a SSN from someone long dead? Why can’t our government do a better job of checking this? Don’t they have access to death certificates? It truly boggles the mind.

In order to save face, the SSA tried to fix the problem.

[W]e determined Maryland and Michigan death information was not always recorded on SSA’s records… Correcting these cases represents an opportunity for SSA to reduce its exposure to future overpayments and improve the accuracy and completeness of the death information it maintains.

As of January 9, 2019, SSA had suspended or terminated benefits and added death information to its records for 95 of the 145 beneficiaries. [Source: Daily Wire]

You’d think making sure their beneficiaries are still alive would be top priority for an agency that works with elderly people. Yet they had to conduct a specific audit—for just 160 accounts—to find these cases of fraud.

Mind you, they didn’t check every last account, just those 160. How many more cases of theft are going on, unfound? Probably way more than the SSA would like to admit.

The bottom line is that significant changes must take place to reduce fraud and lower costs. President Trump should spend some time looking into the SSA.

Socialist darling Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez destroyed her budding reputation when earlier in the year she released her “Green New Deal.”

Touting the proposal as a revolutionary new direction for America, the GND was in fact a mess of amateurish writing and inane ideas. Just about every pundit in the country mocked it. But Mitch McConnell wants to know, on record, where Democrats stand on this policy. And he’s going to find out.

For months the liberal media has celebrated AOC as the second coming. Some have even suggested she was the future of the Democratic Party, and America. The former bartender stole the nomination of a 10-term congressman, by promising to Hispanic voters that she’ll abolish ICE. It was an easy win.

She went on to win the House seat in a largely liberal New York district. The media propped this young woman up, because of her gender and Hispanic background. But they never bothered to test her experience and know-how, especially on crucial issues.

Numerous interviews exposed AOC as embarrassingly uninformed on the economy or world affairs. She spilled more than her fair share of gaffes. Online, she is little more than a child, arguing and insulting even senior members of her own party. She comes off as dangerously inexperienced, rude, and unfit to lead.

Very quickly, after entering office, the Democrats realize the mistake they made. AOC behaves like an idiot when allowed to speak. Things are getting so bad, Democrats are considering redistricting her part of New York, to even eliminate her seat entirely.

But the worst was yet to come when she unveiled her Green New Deal. She hyped it up by promising it would revolutionize our country and economy—while saving the environment. She compared it to FDR’s New Deal, you know, the original socialist program that burdened our country with Social Security.

When her proposal was released, it was quickly mocked by everyone. People couldn’t believe that a sitting lawmaker would propose things like “100% renewable energy” or requiring that every building in America be torn down and rebuilt to new standards. AOC’s Green New Deal wanted to end all air travel everywhere.

Oh, and it also wanted to provide universal income to everyone, including people unable or unwilling to work (yes, that’s in the proposal).

Once this Green New Deal got out to the public, Democrats panicked. The party couldn’t support something so unrealistic or amateurishly written. House Democrats quickly dismissed it, in order to save face.

But Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell wants to know just where Democrats stand on this radical, idiotic proposal. So, he’s going to force them to vote on it.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell will put the Green New Deal to a vote on Tuesday in a move that will force Democrats to take an official stand on the measure and thus pit the party’s moderates against its progressive wing.

“I could not be more glad that the American people will have the opportunity to learn precisely where each one of their senators stand on the “Green New Deal,” McConnell tweeted. “A radical, top-down, socialist makeover of the entire U.S. economy.”

The resolution, which amounts to an ambitious overhaul of the U.S. to combat climate change, undoubtedly will not pass in the GOP-controlled Senate. But Republicans say that the vote will allow them to better gauge Democrats’ commitment to its radical proposals. [Source: Fox News]

The Green New Deal is beyond stupid. It is actually impossible to pass or enforce. How could our government ban air travel? Or force policies that energy experts flat out say are impossible?

But Democrats would gladly dismiss this proposal and hope Americans forget about it. With an election coming up, you better believe the left needs to put their best face on.

McConnell is not letting them get away with it. AOC still stands behind her proposal, a proposal that would cripple our country. The Senate Majority Leader is going to force Democrats to either back this plan or turn on a woman who probably shouldn’t be in Congress.

Let’s see if they have the guts to do that.

Ever since Donald Trump was elected president, numerous Democrats have scored points among voters by attacking him. By spreading the Russian collusion theory, they have manipulated supporters into voting for them and donating big bucks. Maxine Waters has been perhaps the most vocal and outrageous among them. But after Mueller’s report cleared Trump’s name, the Democrat had a bad day.

It’s hard to believe a woman like Maxine Waters holds a position of leadership within our government. For over two years, we’ve seen this Democrat scream and rant on cable news, accusing the President of the United States of wrongdoing.

She had no evidence to back her claims. Yet time and again she called for the impeachment and removal of office of Donald Trump. Even as other Democrats backed off the impeachment narrative, Waters continued to appear on TV, claiming Trump was an illegitimate president.

It showed America what depths Democrats would stoop to in order to slander Trump and just how unhinged they could get in their persecution of the man.

Well, you probably heard by now that Mueller finally released his report. After two years and millions of tax dollars spent, Mueller sent his official findings on Russian interference in the 2016 Election to the Attorney General.

This weekend, the Attorney General released his summation of the findings, revealing to the world that Mueller officially cleared Trump of any wrongdoing. He clearly states that they found no evidence that anyone within the Trump administration (nor any American citizen) aided Russia in any of their attempts to undermine our election.

It was like dropping an A-bomb on the left and their liberal press. For over two years, they have been bombarding the American public with lies that Trump not only worked with Russia, but was a Russian agent working for Putin. This wild and ridiculous slander had zero credibility, yet CNN and politicians like Maxine Waters used it as an excuse to attack our president.

Now that the report has been released, you’d think Maxine would back down. Perhaps admit she was wrong and even apologize to Trump and the American people.


Maxine Waters still believes the “Kremlin Klan” won the White House for President Trump, despite the evidence indicating otherwise.

But no one can convince her that just because Special Counsel Robert Mueller found there was no collusion with Russia, that it’s over.

“This is not the end of anything!” Waters told MSNBC’s Joy Reid as they realized the report was a giant nothing burger for Democrats…

“There’s so much that, uh, needs to be, you know, taken a look at at this point,” she claimed,” and so it’s not the end of everything.” [Source: The American Mirror]

That’s right. Because Maxine has staked her reputation on accusing Trump of treason, she can’t admit she was wrong. She has spent the last two years demanding Trump be impeached, over a rumor invented by Hillary Clinton. Even when a reported $50 million was spent investigating it—finding Trump did nothing wrong—she won’t back down.

Don’t be surprised when the rest of the Democratic Party says the same thing. They used the Russian hoax since 2016 to slander and undermine the president’s administration. Some ran in 2018 on the notion that they’d expose Trump and throw him in jail.

Just because Mueller proved Trump did nothing wrong doesn’t matter. They have voters to lie to—I mean—fulfill their promises to.

President Trump, however, is not going to forget how the Democrats tried to destroy his administration based on a lie. He’s already preparing to roast every last Democrat who spread this rumor as fact, jeopardizing our democracy and government.

On Sunday, The Wall Street Journal reported that advisors to President Trump are not going to refrain from using the findings of the Mueller report against the Democrats; the Journal quoted Bryan Lanza, a deputy communications director for Trump’s 2016 campaign, asserting, “You better believe we’re going to bludgeon them.” [Source: Daily Wire]

Serves them right. We knew the Mueller probe was a witch hunt. Democrats were simply upset that Hillary lost the election. Instead of accepting that reality, they spent years lying about our Command in Chief.

Now, it’s going to cost them. Big.

ISIS was a major threat for years—to both the United States and countries around the world. When he was elected, Donald Trump promised an end to this bloodthirsty terror network. Now, after two years, he makes a startling announcement.

ISIS rose to power during the Obama administration. The former president’s policy on the Middle East seemed to only sow more chaos and destruction. He withdrew troops from Iraq—a major political promise—which caused more bad than good.

Experts warned President Obama at the time that withdrawing troops would create a vacuum of power. It could destabilize the region, leading to more death and destruction.

He did it anyway.

The lack of a strong military presence in the country allowed remnants of Al Qaeda to regroup and grow. The terrorists started capturing territory and killing many. Soon, they called themselves the Islamic State. Not long after that, they invaded Syria, gaining even more ground.

ISIS became the biggest source of terrorism around the world. Over the last few years, they sent or inspired agents to kill many around the world. We know about their horrific acts of death in Europe and the United States. But ISIS spread terror across Africa, the Middle East, and Asia as well.

Donald Trump, during the 2016 Election, promised an end to ISIS. When asked about his plans, he remained tight-lipped. He said he wasn’t going to give away what he wanted to do. That made the media scoff, but Americans cheer. This man had every intention of destroying this terrorist group and he was taking it seriously.

Soon after Trump was elected president, he went to work. The Pentagon, along with our allies, started seeing great progress against ISIS. Soon, they couldn’t even be called an “Islamic State,” because they had so little territory.

Today, President Trump makes a major announcement. ISIS as we knew it is gone for good.

The caliphate has crumbled, and the final offensive is over. While the official announcement hasn’t yet been made – Fox News has been told that this village, the last ISIS stronghold, is liberated…

The last five days, Fox News has witnessed the last major offensive up close -– with U.S.-backed SDF forces attacking ISIS from three sides, pushing the fighters back, house to house, then tent to tent, against the Euphrates River…

This final corner of the caliphate was in the far eastern desert of Syria– it was where ISIS first captured territory, and it is where they finally lost.

A clearing operation is now underway in the town– and an announcement is expected soon.

None of the main surviving ISIS leaders have been caught inside Baghouz. Instead, they left their men to fight alone. It’s thought they prepared ahead for the insurgency.

The scale of the devastation here is incredible. And everyone acknowledges that without U.S. support, it would have taken far longer. [Source: Fox News]

President Trump took to Twitter to show just how much ISIS has lost in the last two years. They went from controlling large portions of the Middle East, to nothing.

“ISIS Caliphate two years ago in red vs. ISIS Caliphate TODAY. (Was even worse in November 2016 before I took office).”

Destroying ISIS was one of Donald Trump’s top campaign promises. Early in his administration we saw progress. Attacks around the world by this group fell, as they continued to lose more ground in Syria and Iraq. Today, they are nothing, barely a rag-tag group of rebels.

But rest assure, our liberal media will not cover this. They will not celebrate this major victory—which has won peace for the entire world—because it was Trump’s doing. The pathetic Democrats who run the mainstream media can’t give credit to the president. Especially with the election around the corner.

We will, though. We won’t let this massive achievement go unannounced. President Trump did what Barack Obama couldn’t (or wouldn’t) do. He destroyed ISIS.

Don’t let this milestone go unnoticed. Share this story to thank President Trump for what he’s achieved for America.

Fans of the wrestler-turned-actor Dwayne Johnson already know about his love for the military. The Rock has hosted numerous events in honor and support of the men and women who serve us. Because of that, an Armored Division named their newest tank after him. He thanked them, only to get roasted by left-wing idiots.

The Rock is one of the biggest names in Hollywood today. From his early days as an icon in professional wrestling, he has gone on to top the box office with his action-packed films. When he’s not starring in movies, he pops up on television and online. It seems like this guy has boundless energy for protects and special events.

He has hosted events that show honor to our veterans and Armed Forces. It appears that Johnson has a special place in his heart for the men and women who risk their lives for the United States. Few could argue with the Rock’s strong sense of patriotism and duty. It’s one of the things that has endeared him to so many Americans.

So, it should come as no surprise that the U.S. Army’s 1st Armored Division, 1st Cavalry Regiment named one of their tanks after the movie star. Johnson heard about this special honor and gave them a shout out on Twitter.

But things quickly took a bad turn.

Soldiers in the U.S. Army’s 1st Armored Division, 1st Cavalry Regiment decided they would name one of their tanks in homage to a celebrity: The Rock. When he publicly thanked them, anti-military critics mauled him on social media…

A couple of days later, the Armored Division noted, “El Paso is falling in love w/ a tank named after film star & @WWE legend @TheRock…

Johnson got the word, answering on Twitter, “Salute of respect & gratitude to the @Blackhawk_SQDN @1stArmoredDiv for the honor of naming their tank, Dwayne ‘The Rock’ Johnson. Heavy duty and bad ass, but most importantly, thank you for your service. #IronSoldiers #BlackhawkSquadron #1stArmouredDivision.” [Source: Daily Wire]

Tell me, who can argue with something like that? The Rock never asked for a tank to be named after him. It’s not like he needs a boost to his ego. He’s a record-breaking movie star, after all.

When he heard about the honor, he should them gratitude and respect. But then he went on to thank them for their service to our country. He was smart enough not to make the moment about himself, but about the brave servicemen who are on the front lines.

That wasn’t good enough for the legion of “anti-war” (read: Anti-Americans) trolls online.

USA Today noted one critic on Instagram stated, “Well I really like you as a person and everything but what is a tank meant for? If it is to take the lives of human beings and others then it is not admirable… I hope it won’t be used… May God bless you all Peace and Love.” Another added, “Not sure having a destructive weapon named after you is such a great honor.”

“Having a death machine named after [you] seems cool until it’s used against beings that don’t truly deserve it.”

“Wow … getting your name on a kill machine.”

“Those poor people in some random oil-rich country ain’t gonna know what’s hit ’em.” [Source: Daily Wire]

Morons, all of them. These idiots just parrot what was spoon-fed them at their liberal colleges, or whatever they’ve read on or Huffington Post.

People like this don’t respect the sacrifice of our brave soldiers. They seem to think that their liberties just protect themselves. They’re so quick to virtue signal about how tanks are “destructive machines,” never thinking about the many lives they save. Like their own sorry asses.

To the Rock’s credit, he never stooped so long to argue with these clowns. He’s better than that and knows that arguing with people who are too stupid to understand the need for tanks isn’t worth his time.

A positive note, after these trolls attacked the Rock, many users rushed to counter them. Many came out in support of the Rock and our soldiers, condemning these unpatriotic idiots.

Just proves, once again, there are more of us than there are of them.

El Paso native, Beto O’Rourke is seeking the White House. The Democrat lost his bid for the Senate, but thanks to huge donations from outside sources, he’s seeking to unseat Donald Trump. But this candidate is more than just the typical, left-wing, Democrat. A new report uncovers the truly bizarre behavior of this man. God help us if he is elected president.

Over the last few years, we’ve learned disturbing things about the rich and powerful. Some of the most wealthy and influential people in America have been exposed for dark patterns of behavior.

The harsh reality is that people within the media, Hollywood, and government have been outed for sexual abuse, corruption, and fraud.

It has sent shockwaves through our society. How can people—once respected by so many—turn out to be vile and in some cases dangerous?

We might never know, but it has taught us to be truly wary of those in the spotlight. Especially those who want to hold public office.

The Democrats have tried to hammer President Trump over his private life. They’ve used the Mueller probe to dig up dirt. When they’ve found nothing alarming, they’ve spread rumor and slander—or outright created it, such as in the case of the Steele dossier.

But while the left invents rumors about the president, we are learning that many of their own have plenty to hide.

That includes presidential hopeful Beto O’Rourke. Beto—who lost his Senate race to Ted Cruz—was already exposed for a DUI hit and run from his 20’s. But it looks like there is much more going on behind the scenes than we realize. A new report uncovers some of the unusual things this man does in his home. It makes us wonder, just what is wrong with this man?

The piece specifically focused on Beto’s marriage to his wife Amy, who indicated that she was not exactly thrilled to be in a marriage that was so heavily involved in politics.

Buried deep in the article was a paragraph that documented his “‘Psycho’-style scares in the shower,” and another bizarre incident from their marriage…

One time, according to a friend, Beto collected an especially verdant turd from one of their kids’ diapers and put it in a bowl, telling Amy it was avocado. [Source: Daily Wire]

That’s only the tip of the iceberg. Apparently Beto had a hard time dealing with his loss to Ted Cruz. According to the report, he drove out—by himself—to the New Mexico desert. He took some of the dirt—which according to legend had regenerative powers—and ATE it. Then he brought it home to his family to eat as well.

Kind of makes you wonder about the man’s mental fitness, huh?

What’s even more disturbing was a post made by the man from a hacker chat board he was a member of. There are not words to really break down what he said, you’ll just have to read it yourself.

“One day, as I was driving home from work, I noticed two children crossing the street,” O’Rourke wrote. “They were happy, happy to be free from their troubles…. This happiness was mine by right. I had earned it in my dreams.”

“As I neared the young ones, I put all my weight on my right foot, keeping the accelerator pedal on the floor until I heard the crashing of the two children on the hood, and then the sharp cry of pain from one of the two,” O’Rourke continued. “I was so fascinated for a moment, that when after I had stopped my vehicle, I just sat in a daze, sweet visions filling my head.” [Source: Daily Wire]

From the context of the article, we can’t be sure if this was just a fantasy or something that actually happened.

But that doesn’t matter, really? This man posted on a public message board a moment when he wanted to run down children for being happy. I’m not a psychologist, but this is truly disturbing behavior from someone that needs serious treatment.

The last place he should be is in the White House!

Normally, I wouldn’t tell you want to do. But America needs to know about this. Be sure to share this article to spread the word.

From the moment Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez came on the scene, left-wing media outlets declared her the future of America. For months we’ve seen websites gush over this self-proclaimed Democratic Socialist. But after only a few months in office, the shine is off the apple. A new poll came out. Looks like AOC is in big trouble.

AOC’s fame began last summer, when she stole the primary seat from a 10-term Democrat. That stunning victory shook the party. Countless other Democrats tried to follow Cortez’s playbook by lurching left. But only she got a bump because of her idiotic promises, like Medicare for All and the abolition of ICE.

She easily won her seat in the New York district. But once she entered Congress this January, it was all downhill.

AOC frequently appeared uninformed during interviews and appearances. Her Twitter feed is an endless parade of nonsensical statements and assertions. Even when members of her own party correct her—men and women with experience and know-how—she responds like a bratty teenager.

But the worst was yet to come, when she promised a country-changing new proposal called the Green New Deal. This environmental-themed legislative proposal—she claimed—would revolutionize our economy and “save” the earth.

When it was released, it was immediately mocked by everyone. It was incredibly amateurish and unrealistic. Among the many things it called for was 100% renewable energy, paychecks for people who do not want to work, and the elimination of air travel.

That’s when many began to realize the horrible mistake they made when they elected this young, ignorant, inexperienced child to public office. AOC was a former bartender and failed businesswoman. She sought public office, like so many others, because it promised wealth, respect, and success—without the work.

But even she can’t pull it off. Now, a new poll shows she might not be in public office for long.

Socialist Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s “unfavorable” rating has skyrocketed now that she has become more well-known, according to a new poll from left-leaning Gallup…

In September, Ocasio-Cortez’s “favorable” vs “unfavorable” rating was nearly deadlocked at 24% and 26% respectively, now it stands at 31% and 41% respectively.

Gallup further noted that Ocasio-Cortez’s favorable rating was “underwater” among the majority of groups and was only viewed as favorable among 56% of Democrats. [Source: Daily Wire]

That’s bad news for AOC. Really bad news. But are we really surprised? This is a woman who got where she is by promising Hispanic voters that she’d get rid of ICE. ICE is the sole agency dedicated to protecting Americans from criminal aliens.

The same woman who jumped on the “Democratic Socialist” bandwagon, thinking it was the easiest path to victory.

But in an age when conservative, capitalist principles are winning under Donald Trump, how can any Democrat think that is a good strategy?

It’s not a tremendous surprise that AOC is tanking among Republicans (who even know who she is). But the fact that she’s underwater among Democrats—key demo’s she needs to succeed—is pretty telling. That proves even liberals are shocked by her unprofessionalism, childishness, and lack of experience.

As you might expect, AOC did not take the news well.

Ocasio-Cortez did not respond well to the news, which is typical of her as she normally reacts to criticisms by playing the victim card, or claiming that they are conspiracy theories, foolish nonsense, or she attacks the source.

“If you want to know what subconscious bias looks like, it’s a headline saying ‘AOC is underwater with every group EXCEPT women, nonwhites, and 18-34 year olds,'” Ocasio-Cortez tweeted. “So older, conservative white men are considered ‘everyone’ and everyone else is discounted as an exception. Cool” [Source: Daily Wire]

Wow. Much like her role model, Hillary Clinton, AOC blames everyone but herself. Hey, Alexandria, how about you take some of the blame yourself. You’re supposed to be serving everyone—not just minorities and women. That fact that older Democrats hate you is a big problem. Particularly because they are the ones that vote!

Her reaction to the news is typical for this woman. She has done nothing but blame other groups and people for her setbacks and mistakes.

Makes you wonder how long she’ll last in office.

Not long.

After losing a Senate battle with Ted Cruz, left-wing Democrat Beto O’Rourke recently announced he was running for president. That’s right, we have another virtue-signaling, left-wing socialist running for president. When asked about his latest contender, President Trump has some truly wonderful things to say.

In 2018, Democratic congressman Beto O’Rourke tried to steal the Senate seat of Texan Ted Cruz. Despite having a snowball’s chance in hell of beating Cruz, a ton of liberal cash flooded the state from outside sources. Even with this Hollywood and New York money, Beto lost.

This is a man who said black people don’t want to work and illegal immigrants are needed to do the work the rest of us won’t. A man whose campaign was accused of sending text messages to supporters, encouraging them to bring illegal immigrants to the polls.

Yep, that’s the state of the Democratic Party today.

Now, wanting to lose on an even bigger stage, Beto has announced his candidacy for president. He sent his announcement videos in the wee hours of the morning to news stations. Odd, but okay.

Already hitting the ground running, this left-wing Irishman (who uses an old nickname “Beto” to sound more ethnic) has said some truly ridiculous things. At one of his first appearances, he made climate change is major issue. He even compared expanding the government, abusing its powers, to “save the earth,” to the brave men who stormed the beaches at Normandy.

No, I did not make that up.

Former congressman Rep. Beto O’Rourke (D-TX) embraced climate change alarmism on the first day of his presidential campaign on Thursday, warning that this is mankind’s “final chance” to “take incredibly bold action on this crisis.”

At multiple campaigns stops in Iowa, O’Rourke hyped climate change hysteria, comparing climate change proposals to “those who were on the beaches in Normandy.” [Source: Daily Wire]

You’d think after forty years of serious environmental regulation and responsibility on our part, the earth would be much better by now. But now, Democrats still want to destroy private industry, landownership, and wealth to fight climate change. I guess it has nothing to do with saving the earth, and more to do with expanding their power.

Let’s be honest. There are too many Democrats running right now to know who will end up going toe-to-toe with Trump. But it won’t be Beto. There are just too many reasons to list why. But a big part of it will be Trump’s brilliant response to Beto’s announcement.

On Thursday, President Donald Trump was asked by the press to react to Democrat Robert “Beto” O’Rourke’s 2020 presidential bid announcement. And in true Trump-fashion, the president, known for mercilessly branding his opponents, mocked the media-beloved O’Rourke for his excessive “hand movement,” the likes of which Trump said he’s “never seen” before…

“I said, ‘Is he crazy or is that just the way he acts?’ So I’ve never seen hand movement – I watched him a little while this morning – doing I assume it was some kind of a news conference,” the president continued…

“And I’ve actually never seen anything quite like it. Study it. I’m sure you’ll agree,” Trump added. [Source: Daily Wire]

These nicknames Trump gives to politicians seem to stick with them. Even the libera media, who hate everything Trump says, can’t shake these names. That’s because when Trump speaks, the world listens.

It doesn’t seem Trump is very worried about Beto. This man couldn’t muster enough support in his home state to win an election, after all. This, during the predicted “Blue Wave” election that was supposed to usher in countless Democrats.

That worked out as well as you’d expect. Democrats once again were humiliated as Republican voters fought back.

Now, Beto thinks he can worm his way into the White House? I guess he’s got a few really bad advisors whispering into his ear. They just want to keep milking him for a salary.

But Trump’s got his number. He doesn’t even have to pick apart Beto’s terrible ideas to crush him. All Trump had to do is comment on his hand movements.

And that’s why Trump is going to be reelected.

Conservative pundit and border wall advocate Ann Coulter turned on the president when she criticized him for not getting the wall finished. It seems the notable commentator hasn’t been paying attention to the ongoing battle between the administration and the left—not to mention the entire media.

President Trump noticed her baseless attacks and fired back—with a new nickname.

President Trump promised during his campaign to build a wall across our Southern border. After two years in office, the wall is far from finished. But before patriots start to rage against the POTUS, keep in mind that Trump cannot build the wall all by himself. It takes money.

That’s the one thing Democrats (and many Republicans) have been denying him. The simple truth is the establishment in D.C. does not want the wall. Both Republicans and Democrats have turned a blind eye to the crisis at our border. They have all benefited from unchecked illegal immigration into our country. That’s why we call it the D.C. swamp, after all. It’s become so corrupt, both parties are at fault.

Despite the ongoing obstruction, President Trump has done the impossible. He’s made good on so many promises, they isn’t room right now to list them all. Suffice it so say, the economy is doing great, people are working, and America is roaring back to life.

Apparently, that’s not good enough for Ann Coulter, who is known for her outlandish opinions and continuous pot-stirring. But perhaps she bit off more than she could chew when she recently attacked the one man working to make America great again.

Now, let me as you this: is it smart to attack Donald Trump in this way? When conservatives face such incredible opposition from the mainstream media, the entertainment industry, and politicians, why would you turn on the one man helping us?

President Trump has defied the critics on every level. His administration is doing amazing work across the board. His accomplishments should be celebrated by conservatives. Yet Coulter wants to poison his base with these attacks (and that’s hardly the only tweet/comment she’s made).

Trump tends to ignore about 99% of the criticism he gets (he gets a lot of it). But I suppose he was particularly upset about this attack. After all, Coulter is a conservative. And she’s attacking a major issue Trump has been working tirelessly to accomplish. Misinformation about the wall is all over the place. The record needs to be set straight.

And, in classic Trump fashion, he did it and gave her a nickname.

President Donald Trump called conservative pundit Ann Coulter a “wacky nut job” on Twitter Saturday after continued criticism from Coulter over his inability to complete a southern border wall.

Wacky Nut Job @AnnCoulter, who still hasn’t figured out that, despite all odds and an entire Democrat Party of Far Left Radicals against me (not to mention certain Republicans who are sadly unwilling to fight), I am winning on the Border. Major sections of Wall are being built… [Source: Daily Caller]

I for one can’t say why Coulter is attacking the president over this. Maybe she really is a wacky nut job. Or perhaps, she just wants more attention. It could even be that she’s not a real conservative, just a pundit who jumps onto a cause for ratings and views.

It’s hard to say, but one thing is clear: Trump is hardly a failure when it comes to the border wall.

His administration is hitting back hard against the tidal wave of migrants who keep charging our border. Over the last few months, enormous caravans have marched across South America, intent on entering our country. They were told they’d be welcomed in, no questions asked. As Trump said, another president might have just let them in.

But President Trump is protecting Americans by enforcing our immigration laws. And, despite what the media says, much of the wall is being built.

Democrats might try to stall or deny him the funds, but it’s happening. It’s going to be finished. Come hell or highwater, our Southern border is going to be secure.

Coulter can complain all she wants, but I don’t see her fighting to make it happen.

Over the last few weeks, we’ve seen the Democrats melt down over anti-Semitic remarks by one of their own.

A newly-elected Muslim has outraged many with her history of attacking Jews and Israel. Democrats are in a struggle over how to react. It has made many question their stance on anti-Semitism.

Now, conservative actor James Woods is firing back.

James Woods is one of the few outspoken conservative actors in Hollywood. While there are many more, few are brave enough to speak out as much as Woods does. Woods doesn’t pull any punches in his criticism of the regressive left. He has a history of calling out dishonest liberals in government, the media, and the entertainment industry.

The recent controversy in Congress has captured Woods’ attention. New congresswoman Ilhan Omar was called out by those in the media for strong, anti-Semitic remarks. This has brought to light her history of attacking Jews and the nation of Israel.

Outrage among Americans compelled the Democrats to decide on some kind of resolution condemning anti-Semitism in the House. Seems pretty standard. I mean, Democrats aren’t supposed to be anti-Semites, right? A resolution like that would pass very easily and ensure representatives like Omar better watch what they say.

Wrong. The process in crafting and passing this resolution erupted into chaos. Numerous Democrats flat out refused to vote on the thing—exposing their real intentions. Nancy Pelosi came out in defense of Omar, trying to make her hateful attacks against an entire people seem reasonable, or at least uninformed.

This has all shaped up to give the Democrats another black eye. They are so scattered and pathetic, they can’t even agree to condemn racism and bigotry.

Actor James Woods stepped into offer his insight into the matter. In a word, he torched them.

On Thursday, actor James Woods took aim in his inimitably blunt way at the Democrat party for its refusal to condemn the anti-Semitic rhetoric of Rep. Ilhan Omar, ripping the Democrats for having “soulless, vile hearts.”

“Oh my God, the #Democrats literally can’t agree to condemn bigotry. Six million Jews were killed by Hitler, they are targets of Muslim terrorists constantly, and @theDemocrats can’t find it in their soulless, vile hearts to condemn anti-Semitism.” [Source: The Daily Wire]

Strong words, but what else could you say about this entire episode?

Democrats elected a woman who has a history of spreading anti-Semitism. You have to wonder at the electorate in Minnesota if this is the kind of person they’d put into public office. Were they so blinded by identity politics that they didn’t realize Omar hates Jews? How is that acceptable?

Beyond that, you have to wonder at how a major American political party could dismiss Omar’s anti-Semitism (or the anti-Semitism of other newcomers)?

What would have happened if the shoe was on the other foot? What if Republicans elected a Muslim to the House—who then proceeded to bash Israel and the Jewish people? You better believe Democrats would be raging, demanding not only an apology, but ways to remove him from office.

Republicans would also demand an apology, making it clear that they—as a party—condemn anti-Semitism in the strongest terms. They wouldn’t have to vote on a resolution to do it, either.

But Democrats cannot do even that. Why? Because they are terrified. They have built up their entire party in the 21st Century to revolve around identity politics. They have told Americans that they value minorities and woman above all else. That black people, transgenders, gays, Muslims, and other minitory groups get preferential treatment by liberals. All to win their votes.

How would it look if Democrats—mostly white men and women—condemned a newly-elected Muslim woman of color? The left-wing rags would have a field day! You see, they don’t care about the content of someone’s character, only the color of their skin.

Democrats can’t condemn Omar, or it would make them look like sexist, racist, bigots. Even when Omar is herself a bigot.

Liberals have dug themselves into a hole. One they will never get out of.

Ad Blocker Detected!

Advertisements fund this website. Please disable your adblocking software or whitelist our website.
Thank You!